Abstract
Exposures to perinatal, familial, social, and physical environmental stimuli can have substantial effects on human development. Yet the complex network structure of the environment (i.e., exposome) makes it challenging to investigate. Here, we analyze the exposome using data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (ABCD, N = 11,235, mean age = 10.9, 52% male) and replicate key findings in an age and sex matched sample from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort (PNC, N = 4,993). Both these cohorts are large, diverse samples of US adolescents with phenotyping at multiple levels of environmental exposure. In ABCD, applying data-driven iterative factor analyses and bifactor modeling, we reduced dimensionality from n=798 exposures to six exposome subfactors and a general (adverse) exposome factor. These factors revealed quantitative differences among racial and ethnic groups. Exposome factors increased variance explained in mental health by 10-fold (from <4% to >38%), over and above other commonly used sociodemographic factors. The general exposome factor was associated with psychopathology (β=0.28, 95%CI 0.26-0.3) and key health-related outcomes: obesity (OR=1.4, 95%CI 1.3-1.5) and advanced pubertal development (OR=1.3, 95%CI 1.2-1.5). In PNC, using substantially fewer available environmental exposures (n=29), analyses yielded consistent associations of the general exposome factor with psychopathology (β =0.15, 95%CI 0.13-0.17), obesity (OR=1.4, 95%CI 1.3-1.6) and advanced pubertal development (OR=1.3, 95%CI 1-1.6). Findings demonstrate how incorporating the exposome framework can be useful to study the role of environment in human development.
Competing Interest Statement
Dr Barzilay serves on the scientific board and reports stock ownership in Taliaz Health, with no conflict of interest relevant to this work. All other authors have no conflicts of interest do declare.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health grants K23MH120437 (RB), RO1MH117014 (TMM) and the Lifespan Brain Institute of Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania. VW was funded by the Bowring Research Fellowship, the Wellcome Trust, and the Templeton World Charity Foundation. The funding organization had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The ABCD Study protocol was approved by the University of California, San Diego Institutional Review Board (IRB), and was exempted from a full review by the University of Pennsylvania IRB. The PNC is a collaboration between the Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) and the Brain Behavior Laboratory at the University of Pennsylvania. University of Pennsylvania and CHOP Institutional Review Boards approved all procedures.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
This work was supported by NIMH grants K23MH120437 (RB) and R01MH117014 (RCG, TMM).
In the revised version, the main findings from the exposome analysis in the ABCD Study were replicated in an independent US youth sample, the Philadelphia neurodevelopmental Cohort.
Data Availability
Data used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (https://abcdstudy.org), held in the National Institute of Mental Health Data Archive. A full list of supporters is available at https://abcdstudy.org/federal-partners.html. A listing of participating sites and a complete listing of the study investigators can be found at https://abcdstudy.org/consortium_members/. Data preprocessing and analysis are detailed at https://github.com/barzilab1/abcd_exposome.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gap/cgi-bin/study.cgi?study_id=phs000607.v3.p2
