Abstract
Background Robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an emerging technology that claims to position THA components with a very high degree of accuracy. It is unclear if this increase in accuracy leads to improved long-term functional outcomes of the patient.
Objectives This systematic review aims to compare robot-assisted THA to those done using conventional manual techniques, in terms of both short-term radiographic outcomes, as well as long-term clinical outcomes.
Methods This systematic review will be conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. A literature search will be conducted on the electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Ovid with a pre-determined search strategy. A manual bibliography search of included studies will also be done. Original articles in English that directly compare robot-assisted THA to manual THA will be included. Data on outcomes will be extracted from included studies and analysis carried out with the help of appropriate software.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors did not receive funding from any external source
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Since this is a review article that does not directly involve patient-related data, IRB approval was not required,
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* Joint first authors
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.