Abstract
Purpose The effect of decompressive craniectomy (DC) on mortality and outcomes in children with elevated intracranial pressure after severe head trauma is strongly debated and high-quality evidence is lacking. This study was conducted to determine whether DC in children with severe head trauma is associated with a decrease in mortality or poor outcomes at discharge from the intensive care unit.
Methods Data on patients < 18 years of age treated in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland during a ten-year period were extracted from TraumaRegister DGU®, forming a retrospective multi-centre cohort study. Descriptive and multivariable analyses were performed to compare mortality and outcomes after decompressive craniectomy and medical management.
Results 2507 patients were included, of which 402 underwent decompressive craniectomy. Mortality was 20.6 % in children undergoing DC compared to 13.7 % after medical management. Observed and predicted mortality after DC and medical management matched in all subgroups except in children between six and 17 years of age, where mortality after DC was lower than predicted. Poor outcome was observed in 27.6 % of DC patients vs. 16.1 % receiving medical management. Logistic regression revealed slightly negative effects of DC on mortality (odds ratio 1.20, not significant) and outcomes (odds ratio 1.56 (95% confidence interval 1.01-2.40).
Conclusion DC did not decrease overall mortality or rates of poor outcome. However, children above six years of age may benefit from DC. High quality prospective studies are urgently needed.
Competing Interest Statement
RL declares that his institution receives an ongoing support from AUC Akademie der Unfallchirurgie, the data holder of TR-DGU, which includes statistical support of data analysis from registry data.
Funding Statement
NB received funding from the Medical Faculty of the University of Duisburg-Essen (IFORES program) and the Stiftung Universitaetsmedizin Essen.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The current study extracted data from the TraumaRegister DGU® according to ethical guidelines. Ethics approval was obtained from the ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Duisburg-Essen (21-10116-BO).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos