Abstract
Background Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKp) are urgent public health threats. Worldwide dissemination of CRKp has been largely attributed to the clonal group (CG) 258. However, recent evidence indicates the global emergence of a CRKp CG307 lineage. Houston, Texas is the first large city in the US with co-circulation of both CRKp CG307 and CG258. We sought to characterize the genomic and clinical factors contributing to the parallel endemic spread of CG258 and CG307.
Methods CRKp isolates were collected as part of the prospective, Consortium on Resistance Against Carbapenems in Klebsiella and other Enterobacterales 2 (CRACKLE-2) study. Hybrid short-read and long-read genome assemblies were generated from 119 CRKp isolates (95 originated from Houston hospitals). A comprehensive characterization of phylogenies, gene transfer, and plasmid content with pan-genome analysis were performed on all CRKp isolates. Plasmid mating experiments were performed with CG307 and CG258 isolates of interest. An inverse-probability weighted Desirability of Ordinal Outcome Ranking (DOOR) analysis was conducted to determine if patients infected/colonized with CG307 had differences in overall clinical outcomes from patients infected/colonized with CG258.
Results Dissection of the accessory genomes suggested independent evolution and limited horizontal gene transfer between CG307 and CG258 lineages. CG307 contained a diverse repertoire of mobile genetic elements harboring carbapenemases, which were shared with other non-CG258 K. pneumoniae isolates. Three unique clades of Houston CG307 isolates contained a diverse repertoire of mobile genetic elements harboring carbapenemases and clustered distinctly from other global CG307 isolates. CG307 were often isolated from the urine of hospitalized patients, likely serving as important reservoirs for genes encoding carbapenemases and extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. The DOOR probability estimate (64%; 95% CI: 48, 79) of our Houston-based cohort suggested that there was a general trend for patients infected/colonized with CG307 to have more favorable outcomes than patients infected/colonized with CG258.
Conclusions Our findings suggest parallel co-circulation of high-risk lineages with potentially divergent evolution. CG307 is widely circulating CRKp clone in the Houston region with the potential to transfer major resistance determinants to other non-CG258 CRKp lineages. Our findings provide major insights into the mechanism of epidemic spread of CRKp.
Competing Interest Statement
CAA reports Grants from NIH, Merck, Memed Diagnostics and Entasis pharmaceuticals. Royalties from UpToDate, and editors stipend from American Society for Microbiology. VGF reports personal consultancy fees from Novartis, Novadigm, Durata, Debiopharm, Genentech, Achaogen, Affinium, Medicines Co., Cerexa, Tetraphase, Trius, MedImmune, Bayer, Theravance, Basilea, Affinergy, Janssen, xBiotech, Contrafect, Regeneron, Basilea, Destiny, Amphliphi Biosciences. Integrated Biotherapeutics; C3J, Armata, Valanbio; Akagera, Aridis; Grants from NIH, MedImmune, Allergan, Pfizer, Advanced Liquid Logics, Theravance, Novartis, Merck; Medical Biosurfaces; Locus; Affinergy; Contrafect; Karius; Genentech, Regeneron, Basilea, Janssen, Royalties from UpToDate; Stock options Valanbio; a patent pending in sepsis diagnostics; educational fees from Green Cross, Cubist, Cerexa, Durata, Theravance, and Debiopharm; and an editors stipend from IDSA.
Funding Statement
Support for this study was provided by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) K24AI121296, R01AI134637, R01AI148342-01, R21AI143229, P01AI152999-01 to C.A.A., UTHealth Presidential Award, University of Texas System STARS Award, and Texas Medical Center Health Policy Institute Funding Program. B.M.H was supported by the NIAID K01AI148593-01. D.v.D was supported by NIH/NIAID grant R01AI143910. BCF was funded using US Veterans Affairs Merit Review Award 5I01 BX003741. Additionally, part of this work was supported by NIAID of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UM1AI104681. Disclaimer: The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Original data was collected with the approval of The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston IRB, the Committee for Protection of Human Subjects (CPHS; Protocol ID: HSC-MS-16-0334; Ethical approval: 5/16/2016), and no further data were collected from these subjects. CRACKLE-2 data collected outside of Houston was approved through the Duke University Health System Institutional Review Board for Clinical Investigations (DUHS IRB; Protocol ID: Pro00071149; Ethical approval: 6/29/2016) with no clinical data reported in this study. All clinical isolates were stripped of identifying information prior to analysis. All clinical data was deidentified upon receipt.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos