Abstract
Introduction Pharmacological treatment of depression mostly occurs in non-psychiatric settings, but factors that determine the initial choice of antidepressant treatment in these settings are not well-understood. This study models how non-psychiatrists choose among four antidepressant classes at first prescription (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRI], bupropion, mirtazapine, or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors [SNRI]), by analyzing electronic health record (EHR) data.
Methods EHR data were from the Mass General Brigham Healthcare System (Boston, Massachusetts, USA) for the period from 1990 to 2018. From a literature search and expert consultation, we selected 64 variables that may be associated with antidepressant choice. Patients who participated in the study were aged 18 to 65 at the time of first antidepressant prescription with a co-occurring International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code for a depressive disorder. Multinomial logistic regression with main effect terms for all 64 variables was used to model the choice of antidepressant. Using SSRI as the reference class, odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals (CI), and likelihood ratio-based p-values for each variable were reported. We used a false discovery rate (FDR) with the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure to correct for multiple comparisons.
Findings A total of 47,107 patients were included after application of inclusion/exclusion criteria. We observed significant associations for 36 of 64 variables after multiple comparison corrections. Many of these associations suggested that antidepressants’ known pharmacological properties/actions guided choice. For example, there was a decreased likelihood of bupropion prescription among patients with epilepsy (adjusted OR 0.41, 95% CI: 0.33–0.51, p < 0.001), an increased likelihood of mirtazapine prescription among patients with insomnia (adjusted OR 1.58, 95% CI: 1.39–1.80, p < 0.001), and an increased likelihood of SNRI prescription among patients with pain (adjusted OR 1.22, 95% CI: 1.11–1.34, p = 0.001).
Interpretation Non-psychiatrists’ selection of antidepressant class appears to be guided by clinically relevant pharmacological properties, indications, and contraindications, suggesting that broadly speaking they choose antidepressants based on meaningful differences among medication classes.
Competing Interest Statement
JWS is a member of the Leon Levy Foundation Neuroscience Advisory Board and received an honorarium for an internal seminar at Biogen, Inc. He is PI of a collaborative study of the genetics of depression and bipolar disorder sponsored by 23andMe for which 23andMe provides analysis time as in-kind support but no payments.
Funding Statement
No external funding was received for the purpose of this study.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study is approved by the IRB of the MassGeneralBrigham (MGB) healthcare system (Boston, MA, USA; Protocol number: #2018P000765) which granted permission to the processing and analyses of the electronic health record data provided by MGB that were used for the purpose of this study.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The electronic health records data used in this study are not available either to the public or per request for privacy protection.
