Abstract
Background Elevated rates of tuberculosis in health care workers demonstrate the high rate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) transmission in health facilities in high burden settings. In the context of a project taking a whole systems approach to tuberculosis infection prevention and control (IPC), we aimed to evaluate the potential impact of conventional and novel IPC measures on Mtb transmission to patients and other clinic attendees.
Methods An individual-based model of patient movements through clinics, ventilation in waiting areas, and Mtb transmission was developed, and parameterised using empirical data from eight clinics in two provinces in South Africa. Seven interventions – co-developed with health professionals and policy-makers - were simulated: 1. queue management systems with outdoor waiting areas, 2. ultraviolet germicidal irradiation systems (UVGI), 3. appointment systems, 4. opening windows and doors, 5. surgical mask wearing by clinic attendees, 6. simple clinic retrofits, and 7. increased coverage of long antiretroviral therapy prescriptions and community medicine collection points through the CCMDD service.
Results In the model, 1. outdoor waiting areas reduced the transmission to clinic attendees by 83% (interquartile range [IQR] 76-88%), 2. UVGI by 77% (IQR 64-85%), 3. appointment systems by 62% (IQR 45-75%), 4. opening windows and doors by 55% (IQR 25-72%), 5. masks by 47% (IQR 42-50%), 6. clinic retrofits by 45% (IQR 16-64%), and 7. increasing the coverage of CCMDD by 22% (IQR 12-32%).
Conclusions The majority of the interventions achieved median reductions in the rate of transmission to clinic attendees of at least 45%, meaning that a range of highly effective intervention options are available, that can be tailored to the local context. Measures that are not traditionally considered to be IPC interventions, such as appointment systems, may be as effective as more traditional IPC measures, such as mask wearing.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The support of the Economic and Social Research Council (IK) is gratefully acknowledged. The project is partly funded by the Antimicrobial Resistance Cross Council Initiative supported by the seven research councils in partnership with other funders including support from the GCRF. Grant reference: ES/P008011/1. NM is additionally funded the Wellcome Trust (218261/Z/19/Z). RGW is funded by the Wellcome Trust (218261/Z/19/Z), NIH (1R01AI147321-01), EDTCP (RIA208D-2505B), UK MRC (CCF17-7779 via SET Bloomsbury), ESRC (ES/P008011/1), BMGF (OPP1084276, OPP1135288 & INV-001754), and the WHO (2020/985800-0). TAY is funded via an NIHR Academic Clinical Fellowship. RMGHJ is funded by ERC (action number 757699)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The clinic attendee movement and ventilation data collection received ethical approval from the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of the University of KwaZulu-Natal (ref. BE082/18), the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Health Sciences of the University of Cape Town (ref. 165/2018), the Research Ethics Committee of Queen Margaret University (ref. REP 0233), and the Observational/Interventions Research Ethics Committee of the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (ref. 14872).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* Joint senior authors
Data Availability
The mathematical model used in this work is available from https://github.com/NickyMcC/WithinClinics The datasets used will be made available from https://datacompass.lshtm.ac.uk/ on publication of the manuscript.
