Doxycycline is a safe alternative to Hydroxychloroquine + Azithromycin to prevent clinical worsening and hospitalization in mild COVID-19 patients: An open label randomized clinical trial (DOXYCOV)

Background and Rationale

Since the outbreak of COVID-19, there has been no proven effective specific treatment for mild or moderate forms of disease[1]. Nonetheless, symptomatic treatments and several therapeutic agents that have demonstrated some clinical efficacy in clinical trials including remdesivir, tocilicizumab, and convalescent plasma[2]. The combination of Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin initially gained widespread use appearing in many national therapeutic guidelines mostly in Africa that has a past history of extensive use of chloroquine for malaria treatment and prophylaxis [1]. On the basis of in vitro evaluation against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 1 (SARS-CoV-1) and SARS-CoV-2 and observational data[3], Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin remain the mainstay treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 in many sub-Saharan African countries, despite concerns about possible adverse drug reactions when used in combination at high doses [4]. In the absence of approved treatment for SARS-CoV-2, many other empirical treatments are being proposed including modern and patrimonial pharmacopeia with known anti-inflammatory and anti-viral properties.

Doxycycline is a derivative of tetracycline that possesses broad antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activities [5] [6]. Doxycycline was FDA-approved as an antibiotic in 1967 and to this day remains in the antibiotic arsenal for diverse clinical use [7]. Doxycycline has demonstrated antimicrobial, antiparasitic, and antiviral properties in several studies, including against some corona viruses[8]. Doxycyline is also generally well tolerated in clinical settings. The main objective of treating mild and moderate forms of COVID-19 is to prevent adverse progression to severe presentation requiring admission and/or intensive care. We thus aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of Doxycycline to that of the national standard guidelines (Hydroxychloroquine plus Azithromycin) for the treatment of mild symptomatic, asymptomatic COVID-19 patients receiving ambulatory care in Cameroon to prevent the disease from evolving to more severe forms potentially requiring admission.

Methods

Results

Trial population

Of the 194 participants who underwent randomization, all received at least one dose of the assigned treatment (Fig. 1). Baseline and disease characteristics of participants are shown in Table 1. The mean age was 39 years, 47.6 % of participants were women. 42.2 % (79/187) of the analyzed participants were mild symptomatic at baseline (42/92 on the Doxycycline baseline regimen versus 37/95 on the Hydroxychloroquine-Azithromycin arm treatment, Table 1). The most common symptoms were fatigue, muscle or joint pain, anosmia, cough, headache, and chill.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1: Trial profile, Intention-to-Treat Populations

Eligibility assessment, randomization and analysis

View this table:

• View inline
• View popup
• Download powerpoint

Table 1: Baseline characteristics

Discussion

Since the outbreak of COVID-19 in December 2019, the world is going through waves of the pandemic of widely variable level of clinical severity. Up to 80% of people affected develop an asymptomatic or mild symptomatic disease. It remains unclear whether a specific treatment is required for mild COVID-19. However, taking into consideration the risk of adverse progression towards severe and critical forms of the disease, several therapeutic approaches are proposed worldwide to prevent need for hospitalization and admission to critical care units.

In early 2020, a small series of COVID-19 patients treated in France with HCQ showed rapid decline in SARS-CoV-2 viral load compared with controls, that seemed further improved by the addition of Azithromycin [11]. However, methodological flaws were reported, limiting the interpretation of the results [12], in addition to few other conflicting trials on the use of Hydroxychloroquine, and its possible cardiac adverse events [3]. Nevertheless, some countries especially in sub Saharan Africa still recommend HCQ-Azithromycin as the reference treatment in the management of COVID-19 patients [13]. The development of vaccines is expected to drastically reduce hospital and intensive care admissions as well as death. In the meantime, many other treatment options for mild and moderate COVID-19 were investigated to mitigate progression towards severe disease, hospitalization or death with variable efficacy, including mostly drugs with antiviral and anti-inflammatory effect [14,15].

In this randomized, open-label trial, we compared Doxycycline with Hydroxychloroquine-Azithromycin for the treatment of ambulatory patients with mild symptomatic or asymptomatic COVID-19. None of the participants progressed to severe disease nor required hospital admission, and we showed the non-inferiority of a 7-day course of Doxycycline to a 5-day course of Hydroxychloroquine-Azithromycin in terms of clinical cure rate, virological suppression, and safety profile. No major adverse event was recorded possibly due to the young age of the study population, the safe dosage used in our participant (400 mg Hydroxychloroquine and 250 mg Azithromycin), and prior exposures to the study drugs for malaria, and in accordance with our preliminary safety study [16].

Our results support the observation by Mohammud M Alam et al. in 2021 in the United States of America, where they evaluated the clinical outcomes of early treatment with doxycycline for 89 high-risk covid-19 patients in long term care facilities, and found that early treatment with Doxycycline for high-risk patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 infections in non-hospital settings, is associated with early clinical recovery, decreased hospitalization, and decreased mortality [17]. The present trial was not placebo-controlled, but the >95% cure rate at Day 10 contrasts with 70% reported in placebo groups at Day 14 in other trial [18].

While the study population was relatively young with limited comorbidities, it reflects the general population of Cameroon and most sub-Saharan countries. In 2019, the Cameroon Demographic Health Survey, estimated that, 60% of the population is aged 20 to 40 years old, and only 14% of the population is above 40 [19]. In the earlier stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, older age was considered among important factors associated with clinical severity [20], however, recent reports indicated for example in more than 3000 adults ages 18 to 34 who contracted COVID-19 and became sick enough to require hospital care, 21% ended up in intensive care, 10% were placed on a breathing machine and 2.7% died [21]. Young adults are therefore a major target population for interventions that would reduce progression to severity to mitigate the public health and economic effects of the pandemic.

In conclusion, despite a modest 65% PCR negativity at Day 10, we report a remarkably high clinical cure rate in response to a Doxycycline based treatment protocol for mild COVID-19 with a safety profile that supports its use as an alternative to prevent adverse disease progression and need for hospitalization.

Patient consent

Obtained

Funding

The study was partially sponsored by a special grant from the French Embassy in Cameroon. The study benefited of material support from the RSD institute Yaounde Cameroon and Yaounde Central Hospital.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests

Data confidentiality

The authors declare having followed the protocols in use at their working center regarding patient’s data publication.

Ethical approval

The study received ethical clearance from the Cameroon National Ethics Committee (N° 2020/07/1585/L/CNERSH/SP). The trial was prospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under number NCT04715295.

Data Statement Section

Due to the sensitive nature of the questions asked in this study, our participants were assured that data would remain confidential and would not be shared.

Author Contribution Statement

Contributors: E-S designed the work, acquired funding, implemented the trial, monitored data collection for the whole trial, monitored statistical analysis, drafted the paper, revised the paper and gave final approval to be published. S-Z designed the work, implemented the trial, monitored data collection, wrote the statistical analysis plan, cleaned and analyzed the data, drafted and revised the paper. M-GF designed the work, revised the draft paper. JC-K designed the work, revised the draft paper. CK member of the data safety monitoring board. LM-K member of the data safety monitoring board. AZ designed the work. YW designed the work, collected data. AA-N collected data. AN-M collected data. JS-T monitored data collection, monitored statistical analysis, revised the paper. WN member of the data safety monitoring board, revised the paper. CMO member of the data safety monitoring board. PJF member of the data safety monitoring board. POZ member of the data safety monitoring board. JCM member of the data safety monitoring board, revised the paper.