Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly affected food systems including food security. Understanding how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted food security is important to provide support, and identify long-term impacts and needs.
Objective Our team- the National Food Access and COVID research Team (NFACT) was formed to assess food security over different U.S. study sites throughout the pandemic, using common instruments and measurements. Here we present results from 18 study sites across 15 states and nationally over the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods A validated survey instrument was developed and implemented in whole or part across the sites throughout the first year of the pandemic, representing 22 separate surveys. Sampling methods for each study site were convenience, representative, or high-risk targeted. Food security was measured using the USDA six-item module. Food security prevalence was analyzed using analysis of variance by sampling method to statistically significant differences.
Results In total, more than 27,000 people responded to the surveys. We find higher prevalence of food insecurity (low or very low food security) since the COVID-19 pandemic, as compared to before the pandemic. In nearly all study sites, we find higher prevalence of food insecurity among Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC), households with children, and those with job disruptions. We also demonstrate lingering food insecurity, with high or increased prevalence over time in sites with repeat surveys. We find no statistically significant differences between convenience and representative surveys, but statistically higher prevalence of food insecurity among high-risk compared to convenience surveys.
Conclusions This comprehensive multi-study site effort demonstrates higher prevalence of food insecurity since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, which in multiple survey sites continues throughout the first year of the pandemic. These impacts were prevalent for certain demographic groups, and most pronounced for surveys targeting high-risk populations.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Alabama: No funding to report. Arizona: This project was supported by a COVID-19 seed grant from the College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University. California-Bay Area: This project was supported by the College of Health and Human Sciences, San Jose State University. Chicago/Illinois: This project was supported by the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, DePaul University Connecticut: Generous funding was provided to Foodshare by the Hunger to Health Collaboratory. Maine: We would like to thank the University of Maine School of Food and Agriculture and the George J. Mitchell Center for Sustainability Solutions for their financial support. Maryland: This research was supported by a Directed Research grant from the Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future. Massachusetts: Funding for The Greater Boston Food Bank team was provided by the Hunger to Health Collaboratory. Michigan: Funding was provided from Wayne State University faculty startup funds. National: This research was supported by the College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University with support from the college COVID-19 seed grant and the university Investigator Research Funds; the University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Rapid COVID-19 seed grant; a Directed Research grant from the Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future; and the University of Vermont, the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, the Gund Institute for Environment, Office of the Vice President of Research, and the UVM ARS Food Systems Research Center. New York City: Special thanks to the Vincentian Institute for Social Action for sponsoring both studies. NY State: Funded by the Natural Hazards Center, Quick Response Grant. The Quick Response program is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation (Award #1635593). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF or the Natural Hazards Center. NY Capital Region: Funding for the Qualtrics Panel Survey was provided by the Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research. Funding for the non-Qualtrics Panel Survey was provided by UAlbany Presidents COVID-19 MHD Engaged Researchers Seed Funding Program. NY Central/Upstate: This work was supported by a Cornell Atkinson Center COVID-19 Rapid Response Fund award. Utah: We would like to thank the Utah Create Better Health Program, Utah State University Extension, and the Utah Department of Workforce Services for their support and assistance with this project. Vermont: Funding was provided by The University of Vermont College of Agriculture and Life Sciences and Office of the Vice President of Research, The Gund Institute for Environment, and the UVM ARS Food Systems Research Center. Washington: The WAFOOD survey team wishes to thank the UW Population Health Initiative (UWPHI), the UW School of Public Health (UWSPH), and the Department of Epidemiology for their support.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB approval for the Alabama site was provided by the Auburn University at Montgomery Internal Review Board. The Arizona State University Office of Research Integrity and Assurance approved the study for the Arizona State University and University of Arizona teams under protocol number: 2004590240A00. The California Bay area study was approved by the San Jose State University Human Subjects Institutional Review Board under exempt registration (IRB Protocol Tracking Number: 20162). The DePaul University Institutional Review Board reviewed and approved the Chicago site study as exempt research. The DYouville College Institutional Review Board reviewed and approved the research for the Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New York City sites as exempt research. The University of Maine Institutional Review Board for the Protection of Human Subjects provided exempt ethical approval for the Maine site. IRB exempt approval for the Maryland site was provided by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Institutional Review Board under IRB#2359. The University at Albany Institutional Review Board provided IRB review for the Albany site. The two research projects were approved as exempt under protocol numbers 20X296 and 20X196. IRB approval for the NY Central site was provided by the Cornell University Institutional Review Board for Human Participant Research. The Utah State University Institutional Review Board approved the Utah site research through Exempt Review under protocol number 11339. IRB exempt status approval for the Washington site was provided by the University of Washington IRB (UW IRB committee J). IRB approval for the Wisconsin site was provided by the University of Wisconsin,Milwaukee Institutional Review Board under Category 2 exempt status. IRB approval for the Vermont site was provided by The University of Vermont Institutional Review Board under protocol number 0000873.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The survey instruments are archived at Harvard Dataverse.
https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/foodaccessandcoronavirus
