ABSTRACT
Background Patients with severe COVID-19 seem to have a compromised antiviral response and hyperinflammation. Neutrophils are critical players in COVID-19 pathogenesis. IL-17A plays a major role in protection against extracellular pathogens and neutrophil attraction and activation. We hypothesized that secukinumab, an anti-IL17A monoclonal antibody, could mitigate the deleterious hyperinflammation in COVID-19.
Methods BISHOP was an open-label, single-center, phase-II controlled trial. Fifty adults hospitalized Covid-19 patients, confirmed by a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR, were randomized 1:1 to receive 300mg of secukinumab subcutaneously at day-0 (group A) plus standard of care (SoC: antiviral drugs, antimicrobials, corticosteroids, and/or anticoagulants) or SoC alone (group B). A second dose of 300mg of secukinumab could be administered on day-7, according to staff judgment. The primary endpoint was ventilator-free days at day-28 (VFD-28). Secondary efficacy and safety outcomes were also explored.
Findings An intention-to-treat analysis showed no difference in VFD-28: 23.7 (95%CI 19.6-27.8) in group A vs. 23.8 (19.9-27.6) in group B, p=0.62; There was also no difference in hospitalization time, intensive care unit demand, the incidence of circulatory shock, acute kidney injury, fungal or bacterial co-infections, and severe adverse events. Pulmonary thromboembolism was less frequent in group A (4.2% vs. 26.2% p=0.04). There was one death in each group. Viral clearance, defined by the viral load fold change (2-ΔΔCT) in upper airways, between day-0 and day-7, was also similar: 0.17 (0.05-0.56) in group A vs. 0.24 (0.10-0.57) in group B.
Interpretation The efficacy of secukinumab in the treatment of Covid19 was not demonstrated. No difference between groups in adverse events and no unexpected events were observed.
Funding Novartis Brazil supported this research providing expert input in the development of the project, drug supply, data management, and monitoring.
Competing Interest Statement
GGR received personal payments for lectures from Abbvie, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis and UCB; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Abbvie, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis and UCB; and personal payments for participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board Abbvie, Janssen, Lilly and Novartis. RCL received honoraria for presentations and speakers bureaus; and support for attending meetings, including travel and hotel expenses from Novartis. RT and FF were Novartis employees until this submission. ADCS, AFM, ATNS, AJAO, DS, HCG, ICG, MMT, SQL, RSA, JSSBF and RPS declare no competing interests.
Clinical Trial
Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC) RBR-5vpyh4, on June 6th, 2020
Funding Statement
Novartis Brazil supported this research providing expert input in the development of the project, drug supply, data management, and monitoring. This project was also supported by CNPq (R.S.A.: 312688/2017-2 and 439119/2018-9). MEC/CAPES 118 (14/2020 - 23072.211119/2020-10), FINEP (0494/20 01.20.0026.00), UFMG-NB3, FINEP number 1139/20 (RSA).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
National Research Ethics Commission (CONEP) approval number 4.100.115, on June 20th, 2020
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
De-identified data can be made available to others on approval of a written reasonable request to the corresponding author.
