Abstract
Background/Aims Children with Down’s syndrome (DS) are known to have poorer visual acuity that neurotypical children. One report has shown that children with DS and nystagmus also have poor acuity when compared to typical children with nystagmus. What has not been established, is the extent of any acuity deficit due to nystagmus and whether nystagmus impacts on refractive error is within a population with DS.
Methods Clinical records from The Cardiff University Down’s Syndrome Vision Research Unit were examined retrospectively. Binocular visual acuity and refraction data were available for 50 children who had DS and nystagmus (DSN) and 176 children who had DS but no nystagmus. Data were compared between the two groups, and with published data for neurotypical children with nystagmus.
Results The study confirms the deficit in acuity in DS, compared to neurotypical children, of approximately 0.2 LogMAR and shows a further deficit attributable to nystagmus of a further 0.2 logMAR beyond the first year of life. Children with DS and no nystagmus appear to have acuity that mirrors that of typical children with nystagmus, while children with both DS and nystagmus have a significant additional impairment. Children with DS have a wide range of refractive errors, but nystagmus increases the likelihood of myopia. Prevalence and axis direction of astigmatism, on the other hand appears unaffected by nystagmus.
Conclusion Nystagmus confers an additional visual impairment on children with Down’s syndrome and must be recognised as such by families and educators. Children with both DS and nystagmus clearly need targeted support.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
Not applicable
Funding Statement
Members of the research group who contributed to the data collection have been funded over the years by Down's Syndrome Association, Medical Research Council, Mencap City Foundation, National Lotteries Charity Board with Mencap, PPP Healthcare Medical Trust, National Eye Research Centre, College of Optometrists, Action Medical Research and Garfield Weston Foundation, and the Malaysian Government Postgraduate Scholarship (Majlis Amanah Rakyat, MARA).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
National Institute for Social Care and Health Research Ethics Service
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Disclaimer: The views expressed in the submitted article are the author’s own and not an official position of the institution or funder.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author JMW upon reasonable request
