Abstract
Background Antibodies raised against human seasonal coronaviruses (sCoVs), which are responsible for the common cold, are known to cross-react with SARS-CoV-2 antigens. This prompts questions about their protective role against SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 severity. However, the relationship between sCoV exposure and SARS-CoV-2 correlates of protection are not clearly identified.
Methods We performed a cross-sectional analysis of cross-reactivity and cross-neutralization to SARS-CoV-2 antigens (S-RBD, S-trimer, N) using pre-pandemic serum from four different groups: pediatrics and adolescents, persons 21 to 70 years of age, older than 70 years of age, and persons living with HCV or HIV.
Findings Antibody cross-reactivity to SARS-CoV-2 antigens varied between 1.6% and 15.3% depending on the cohort and the isotype-antigen pair analyzed. We also show a range of neutralizing activity (0-45%) in serum that interferes with SARS-CoV-2 spike attachment to ACE2. While the abundance of sCoV antibodies did not directly correlate with neutralization, we show that neutralizing activity is rather dependent on relative ratios of IgGs in sera directed to all four sCoV spike proteins. More specifically, we identified antibodies to NL63 and OC43 as being the most important predictors of neutralization.
Interpretation Our data support that exposure to sCoVs triggers antibody responses that influence the efficiency of SARS-CoV-2 spike binding to ACE2, and may also impact COVID-19 disease severity through other latent variables.
Evidence before this study There is a growing body of evidence showing that within the population there are varying levels of pre-existing immunity to SARS-CoV-2 infection and possibly COVID-19 disease severity. This immunity is believed to be attributable to prior infection by four prevalent seasonal coronaviruses (sCoVs) responsible for the common cold. Pre-existing immunity can be assessed in part by antibodies directed to sCoVs that also cross-react to SARS-CoV-2 antigens. The SARS-CoV-2 spike and, more specifically, the receptor binding domain are the primary targets for neutralizing antibodies. It is unclear if cross-reactive antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 are neutralizing and are also responsible for the broad spectrum of COVID-19 disease severity, from asymptomatic to critical, observed in the infected population.
Added-value of this study Here we carried out a detailed analysis of sCoV prevalence in samples acquired before the pandemic from individuals of various age groups and in people living with HIV and HCV. We then analyzed the frequency of all the different types of antibodies that cross-react to three SARS-CoV-2 antigens. We found a high level of people with cross-reactive antibodies, surprisingly we also detected that some people have antibodies that block the SARS-CoV-2 spike from binding to its human receptor, ACE2. By using machine learning, we were able to accurate predict which individuals can neutralize SARS-CoV-2 spike-ACE2 interactions based on their relative ratios of antibodies against the four sCoVs.
Implications of all the available evidence We demonstrate that it not absolute levels of sCoVs antibodies that are predictive of neutralization but the relative ratios to all four sCoVs, with NL63 being the most weighted for this prediction. Machine learning also highlighted the existence of latent variables that contribute to the neutralization and that may be related to the type of cellular immune response triggered by the infection to certain sCoVs. This study is one of the first to identify a functional relationship between prior-exposure to sCoV and the establishment of a certain degree of immunity to SARS-CoV-2 by way of a cross-reactive antibody response.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
none
Funding Statement
This study was supported in part by a COVID-19 Rapid Response grant by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and by a grant supplement by the Canadian Immunity Task Force (CITF) to M-A Langlois and by the National Research Council of Canada Collaborative R&D Initiative Pandemic Response Challenge Program Grant to SAL Bennett and M Cuperlovic-Culf (PR031-1).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Use of human samples for this study was approved by the University of Ottawa Ethics Review Board: Certificates H-04-20-5727, H-04-21-6643 and H-07-20-6009.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding: This study was supported by a grant by the CIHR (VR2 -172722) and by a grant supplement by the CITF, and by a NRC Collaborative R&D Initiative Grant (PR031-1).
Added Figure S4 and minor edits to text, figures and formatting throughout.
Data Availability
All the study raw data will be made publicly available upon request.
