ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to describe the modern contraceptive use by women of childbearing age in Zambia.
METHODS The study was retrospective descriptive observational design. Secondary data of 13,683 women aged 15 - 49 who participated in the ZDHS 2018 were analysed. Data were extracted using a data extraction tool and analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26. Since the ZDHS 2018 used numeric data, the study was quantitative research. The study examined the association between demographic and socioeconomic characteristics and modern contraceptive use using Pearson, Chi-Square and multiple logistic regression.
RESULTS In Zambia, the most used type of modern contraception were injectables (52%). Female condom is the most known type of modern contraceptives (55%). The significant factors associated with the use of modern contraceptives were age group 25-29 and 45-49 (AOR=1.41 95% CI=1.05, 1.90) and (AOR=0.41, 95% CI 0.28, 0.62), respectively. Being married and widowed (AOR=2.18, 95% CI 1.75, 2.71), and (AOR=0.50, 95% CI 0.31, 0.78), respectively. The likelihood utilization varied across the gradient of parity, educational attainment, and wealth. Educated and wealthy women were more likely to use modern methods compared to women with no education and in the poor category, respectively.
CONCLUSION The study established that factors such as age, marital status, the number of living children (parity), religion, and education level and wealth index remain significant issues in determining modern contraceptive use among childbearing women aged 15 to 49 in Zambia. Therefore, concerted efforts are required to increase use of modern methods of contraception by addressing these determinants.
Strengths and limitations of the study
The study utilized secondary data from the ZDHS 2018 as a proxy to establish the determinants of contraceptive use among women of childbearing age 15-49 in Zambia and therefore added to the body of knowledge.
This study was limited by its cross-sectional nature and hence causal inferences cannot be made.
The study relied on self-report measures, which could be affected by social desirability bias or memory bias
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study received no external funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Institution Review Board STATEMENT Ethical clearance was obtained from the University of Lusaka, School of Medicine & Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee Reference: IORG0010092/ MPH1622955. National Health Research Authority (NHRA) granted permission (Ref No. NRA 000016/26/01/2021) in line with the Act of Parliament (number 2 of 2013) which mandates all researchers to submit their research protocols to the NHRA upon receipt of approval from the Research Ethics Committee or an Institutional Review Board. No formal ethical clearance was obtained from ZSA as the study analysed publically available data.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Dataset are available to third parties upon request to Corresponding Author
