Abstract
Background CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 enzymes are essential in the metabolism of antidepressants and antipsychotics. Genetic variation in these genes may increase risk of adverse drug reactions. Antidepressants and antipsychotics have previously been associated with risk of diabetes. We examined whether individual genetic differences in CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 contribute to these effects.
Methods We identified 31,579 individuals taking antidepressants and 2,699 taking antipsychotics within UK Biobank. Participants were classified as poor, intermediate or normal metabolisers of CYP2D6, and as poor, intermediate, normal, rapid and ultra-rapid metabolisers of CYP2C19. Risk of diabetes mellitus represented by HbA1c level was examined in relation to the metabolic phenotypes. We analysed drugs either individually (where sample size permitted) or grouped by class.
Results CYP2D6 poor metabolisers taking paroxetine had higher Hb1Ac than normal metabolisers (mean difference: 2.29mmol/mol; p < 0.001). Among participants with diabetes who were taking venlafaxine, CYP2D6 poor metabolisers had higher HbA1c levels compared to normal metabolisers (mean differences: 10.15 mmol/mol; p < 0.001. Among participants with diabetes who were taking fluoxetine, we observe that CYP2D6 intermediate metabolisers and decreased HbA1c, compared to normal metabolisers (mean difference - 7.74mmol/mol; p=0.017). We did not observe any relationship between CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 metabolic status and HbA1c levels in participants taking antipsychotic medication.
Conclusion Our results indicate that the impact of genetic variation in CYP2D6 differs depending on diabetes status. Although our findings support existing clinical guidelines, further research is essential to inform pharmacogenetic testing for people taking antidepressants and antipsychotics.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by a Medical Research Council doctoral studentships awarded to Isabelle Austin-Zimmerman, Anjali Bhat, and Jasmine Harju-Seppänen. Baihan Wang was supported by the China Scholarship Council-University College London Joint Research Scholarship. Haritz Irizar has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 220 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement no 747429 and is currently supported by a grant from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health. Gazaleh Fatemifar is funded by the American Heart Association Institutional Data Fellowship Program (AHA Award 17IF3389000). Elvira Bramon has recieved the following grant funding that supported this work: National Institute of Health Research UK (NIHR200756); Mental Health Research UK John Grace QC Scholarship 2018; BMA Margaret Temple Fellowship 2016; Medical Research Council New Investigator and Centenary Awards (G0901310, G1100583), MRC (G1100583); NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and University College London.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The UK Biobank study was approved by the North-West Research Ethics Committee (ref 06/MREC08/65) in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos