Abstract
Background The Sustainable Development Goals target significant reductions in maternal and under-five deaths by 2030. The prevalence of these deaths is significantly associated with short birth interval (SBI). Identification of factors associated with SBI is pivotal for intervening with appropriate programmes to reduce these adverse consequences. This study aimed to determine the factors associated with SBI in Bangladesh.
Methods The Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2017/18 and Bangladesh Health Facility Data 2017 were linked and analysed. SBI was defined as an interval between consecutive births of 33 months or less, as recommended by the World Health Organization. We used descriptive statistics to summarise respondents’ characteristics and multilevel Poisson regression to assess the predictors of SBI.
Results Around 26% of live births occurred in short intervals, with a further higher prevalence among younger, uneducated, or rural women. The likelihoods of SBI were lower among women aged 20-34 years (PR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.11-0.17) and ≥ 35 years (PR, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.02-0.05) as compared to the women aged 19 years or less. Women from households with the richest wealth quintile experienced lower odds of SBI (PR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.45-0.85) compared to those from the poorest wealth quintile. The prevalences of SBI were higher among women for whom the children born from the second most pregnancies died (PR, 5.23; 95% CI, 4.18-6.55), those who were living in Chattogram (PR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.12-2.07) or Sylhet (PR, 2.83, 95% CI, 2.08-3.86) divisions. Availability of modern contraceptives at the nearest healthcare facilities was 66% protective to the occurrence of SBI (PR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.22-0.78). Also, the prevalence of SBI increased around 85% (PR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.33-2.18) for every kilometer increase in the distance of nearby health facilities from women’s homes.
Conclusion More than a quarter of live births in Bangladesh occurred in short intervals. This relatively high prevalence is a challenge for Bangladesh in reducing pregnancy-related adverse consequences, including maternal and child mortality. Policies and programmes are needed to increase awareness of SBI and associated adverse health outcomes and expand access to modern contraceptives.
Introduction
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends at least 24 months interval between a live birth or termination to the next conception or 33 months interval between a live birth or termination to the next live birth (1). The intervals shorter than these durations are considered as short birth intervals (SBI), which are associated with several adverse health outcomes, including preterm birth (2,3), low birth-weight (2,3) and small for gestational age (3). Neonatal and infant mortality are also found to be higher among children born in SBI (3,4). Maternal morbidities such as preeclampsia, high blood pressure, and premature rupture of the membrane are also found higher among mothers having a conception in short intervals of the previous birth. Importantly, these are the major causes of around 822 maternal deaths in a day in low- and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) (5,6).
Globally, around 25% of live births occur in short intervals, with relatively high proportions in Central Asia (33%) and Sub-Saharan Africa (57%) (7). In Bangladesh, the prevalence is around 26% and equates to over a million live births in a year (8). Like many other LMICs, this high number of births in short intervals caused a large-scale of several adverse health outcomes (9,10) including maternal and child mortality (6) and prevented Bangladesh from achieving the relevant Millennium Development Goals during the period 2000-2015. Reduction of these adverse health outcomes is a priority of the Sustainable Development Goals, which will require substantially reduce the prevalence of births in SBI through initiating policies and programmes.
Knowledge of the current prevalence of SBI and associated factors are essential for appropriate policy and programme development to reduce SBI. However, there are at least two challenges in Bangladesh and other LMICs that make these difficult, which are (i) inaccurate measurement of SBI and (ii) inconsistent list of factors associated with SBI. Most studies conducted in Bangladesh and similar settings used 24 months interval from one birth to the next birth for measuring SBI, instead of the WHO recommendation of 33 months. In the context of Bangladesh, previous studies used inconsistent duration in defining SBI, including <24 months (11), <33 months (12), <36 months (10) and <39 months (13). The factors associated with SBI are also inconsistent across the studies (14–18). Most of these studies considered only a limited set of confounding factors, mainly the individual-level factors including women’s age, education, occupation (12,16,19) and/or analysed small datasets (19). Moreover, some studies used single-level logistic regression although their data were hierarchical where single-level analysis often produces imprecise results (10,11,13,20). Furthermore, healthcare facility-level factors such as distance from participants’ houses were rarely taken into account (21,22). This study aimed to assess the multidimensional factors associated with SBI in Bangladesh using the WHO classification of SBI and using a wide range of confounding factors.
Methods
Study overview
Data analysed in this study come from the nationally representative Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) 2017/18 and Bangladesh Health Facility Survey (BHFS) 2017. The geographic variables (GPS point location) of these datasets were linked using the administrative boundary link. The detail for this method has been published elsewhere (23,24). The sampling procedure of both surveys can be found in the respective survey reports (25,26).
The 2017/18 BDHS was conducted by the National Institute of Population Research and Training as part of the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) program and supervised by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare of Bangladesh. The survey interviewed 20,127 reproductive-aged ever-married women selected through a two-stage stratified random sampling procedure. At the first stage, 675 primary sampling units (PSUs) were selected randomly from the list of 293,579 PSUs generated by the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics as part of the 2011 National Population Census. Data were collected from 672 of these PSUs and the remaining three were excluded due to flood. At the second stage of sampling, 30 households were selected randomly from each of the selected PSUs. This produced a list of 20,160 households, among which interview was conducted in 19,457 households.
The 2017 BHFS is the source of healthcare facility data in Bangladesh. The survey collected data from 1,524 healthcare facilities selected proportionately from the public, private and non-government sectors. Both census and stratified random sampling methods were used to select these facilities from the 19,811 registered healthcare facilities in Bangladesh.
Sample
Of the 20,127 women included in the 2017/18 BDHS, 5,941 women were included in this study. The inclusion criteria were i) had at least two pregnancies, of which the most recent one occurred within five years of the survey date and ended with live birth, (ii) the second most recent pregnancy ended either with live birth or termination and (ii) the date of live birth after the most recent pregnancy and the date of birth or termination after the second most recent pregnancy were recorded.
Outcome variable
In this study, SBI is the outcome variable. The BDHS recorded the interval between the end of the second last pregnancy through termination or live birth to the end of the most recent pregnancy through live birth. We categorised these data in line with the WHO’s recommendation to define SBI. Thus, births were considered to have occurred in short intervals if the last live births occurred at 33 months or lesser intervals of the second last live births or terminations (1).
Exposure variables
A comprehensive literature search was conducted in five databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, CINHAL, and Google Scholar) to identify potential determinants of SBI (10,11,13– 18,20). Factors identified were then summarised as individual-, household-and community-level factors. Individual-level factors were maternal age at birth (≤19, 20-34, ≥35 years), maternal age at first birth (used as a continuous variable), maternal educational status (no formal education, primary, secondary, higher), and mothers’ employment status at the time of the survey (employed, unemployed). Household-level factors were partners’ educational status (no formal education, primary, secondary, higher), sex of the household’s head (male, female), the total number of children ever given birth (≤2, >2), exposure to mass media (little exposed, moderately exposed, highly exposed), survival status of the child born from the second most pregnancy (yes, no), and wealth quintile (poorest, poorer, middle, richer, richest). Place of residence (urban, rural) and region (seven administrative divisions, namely Barishal, Chattogram, Dhaka, Khulna, Mymensingh, Rajshahi, Rangpur, Sylhet) were the community-level factors. To our knowledge, this is the first study in Bangladesh and other LMICs that considered the health facility-level factors because of their potential role in modern contraception use in SBI (21,27,28). We generated four health service variables: average distance to the nearest family planning facility, family planning service availability, readiness to provide family planning services, and general health facility readiness. The details of this approach can be found elsewhere (28,29).
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics with frequency and percentage distribution were used to describe the characteristics of the respondents. The distribution of SBI across individual-and household-level characteristics was also examined. Statistical significance of the difference in distribution was assessed using the chi-square test. Availability of modern contraceptives across facility types and division were also explored. The data were hierarchical, as respondents were nested in the households, and households nested in the PSU. Therefore, we expected responses from the same household and cluster would behave more alike than different households and clusters (30). Moreover, the outcome of this study, i.e., SBI, is a common outcome. Previous studies found simple logistic regression models often overestimate the odds for a common outcome and hierarchical data (30,31). Therefore, we used multilevel Poisson regression model that accounts for these multiple hierarchies and dependency in data, and the problem of overestimation (32). Five models were run separately. Model 1 was the intercept-only model, presenting variance in prevalence of SBI across PSUs. Model 2 included all individual-and household-level factors. Model 3 included community-level factors. In model 4, health facility-level variables were included. Model 5 was the final model that included all factors. We checked multicollinearity before entering these variables into the models. If evidence of multicollinearity was found (VIF>10), the relevant variable was deleted. Results were reported as Prevalence Ratios (PR) with 95% Confidence Intervals (95% CI). The Intra-Class Correlation (ICC), Variance Inflation Factor (VIF), AIC and BIC for each model were recorded and compared to select the best model. The ICC value was calculated by dividing the between-clusters-variance of SBI (random intercept variance) by the total variance of SBI (sum of between-clusters-variance and within-cluster (residual) variance of SBI). Geographical linkage between survey and health facility data was performed using the Statistical package R. All other statistical analyses were conducted using Stata version 15.1 (Stata Corp, College Station, Texas, USA).
Result
Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents
Table 1 shows the background characteristics of the respondents. A majority (86.24%) of women were 20-34 years old and one-fourth reported that they had their first birth before reaching 19. Around half of respondents had completed secondary-level education and 86% reported that the head of the household was a man. Overall, 8% of respondents reported that the child born from their second most recent pregnancy had died.
Distribution of short birth intervals across socio-demographic characteristics
Over 26% of respondents had their last birth in a short interval of their second most recent birth. The prevalence of SBI was higher among respondents aged 20-34 years (78%), who had their first birth ≤19 years (72.65%), or not engaged in formal work (57.23%). SBI was also higher among respondents who had ≤2 children at the time of the survey (56.56%), not exposed to mass media (41.51%) or had their child born from the second most pregnancy died (19.91%).
Characteristics of health facilities and their distribution
The division-wise distribution of health facilities that provided modern contraceptives and their average distance from BDHS clusters are presented in Table 2.
Around 89% (1357/1524) of health facilities included in the 2017 BHFS provided modern contraceptives to the clients. Upazila to community-level government hospitals were the major providers of modern contraceptives (93%). The national average distance of modern contraception-providing health facilities from respondents’ houses was 6.36 km. This distance was higher in the Sylhet division (8.34 km) and lower in the Chattogram division (5.85 km).
Age-standardised prevalence of short birth intervals
We calculated the age-standardised prevalence of SBI across regions in Bangladesh (Figure 1, results not shown in the table) as there were substantial variations in the prevalences of SBI in Bangladesh across different age-groups of women. The distribution of women aged 15-49 in the 2011 national population census was used for standardisation. The age-standardised prevalence of SBI in the Sylhet region was 44.14%, almost two times higher than that in the Barishal region (22.20%).
Age-standardised prevalence of short birth intervals in Bangladesh, BDHS 2017/18.
Model diagnosis
Of the five models conducted separately with individual-, household-, community-, and the health facility-level confounders, the best model was selected by comparing the model statistics including Akaike’s information criterion (AIC), Bayesian information criterion (BIC), and intra-class correlation (ICC). The best model was the one that had the smallest AIC, BIC and ICC. According to these markers, Model 5 that included individual-, household-, community-, and health facility-level variables was the best. The ICC in the null model was 18.92%, which was reduced to 4.12% once individual-, household-, community-, and health facility-level factors were adjusted in Model 5.
Predictors of short birth intervals
The results of the multilevel Poisson regression models examining factors associated with SBI are presented in Table 5. There was a decline in the prevalence of SBI with the increasing age of respondents. The PR was 86% (PR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.11-0.17) and 97% (PR, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.02-0.05) lower among the respondents aged 20-34 years and ≥35 years, respectively, compared to the respondents aged ≤19 years. For each year increase in age at first birth leads to a 31% decrease in the prevalence of SBI (95% CI, 0.59-0.86). The PR was around 25% (PR,0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.93) lower among women residing in the female-headed households than those in the male-headed households. The PR of SBI was 5.23 (95% CI, 4.18-6.55) times higher for women whose second most recent child died compared to women whose second most recent child was alive. This study found a 39% (95% CI, 0.45-0.85) decline in the prevalence of SBI among respondents who belong to the richest wealth quintile than the respondents with the poorest wealth quintile. Respondents living in the Chattogram (PR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.12-2.07) and Sylhet (PR, 2.83; 95% CI, 2.08-3.86) divisions reported a higher PR of SBI than those in the Barishal region. At the health facility level, we found PR of SBI declined around 32% (PR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54-0.95) and 66% (95% CI; 0.22-0.58) if the nearest health facilities provided the long-acting and short-acting modern contraceptives, respectively. We found that for every kilometer increase in distance of the nearest health facilities that provide modern contraceptives, women were 1.85 times (95% CI, 1.33-2.18) more likely to report a birth or pregnancy in short intervals.
Multilevel Poisson regression examining associated factors of short birth intervals in Bangladesh (N=5,941)
Discussion
Analysing the nationally representative data in a multilevel framework, in this study, we explored the prevalence of SBI in Bangladesh and factors associated with SBI. Factors found to be positively and significantly associated with SBI are lower maternal age at first birth, the experience of the death of the second most recent child, average distance of nearby health facilities from the respondents’ cluster, and residential location in the Chattogram and Sylhet divisions. The availability of modern contraceptives at the nearest health facilities and female-headed households were found to be protective of SBI.
The prevalence of SBI found in this study (26%) is slightly higher than the global average (25%) (33), but it is in the range of global range (19.4% to 65.9%) (34,35). However, these global estimates used mostly 24 months interval to compute SBI, whereas, in this study, we considered 33 months following the WHO guideline. In that consideration, our observed prevalence may be lower than a global estimate of SBI based on the WHO guideline. This estimate for Bangladesh, which may be relevant for other LMICs, will help make evidence- based policies and programs for SBI reduction. Indeed, the target for SBI reduction was rooted around two decades ago, in 2000, as part of the Millennium Development Goals and remains a priority in the Sustainable Development Goals (10–13,20). The focus of the current development goals is to improve maternal health and reduce adverse consequences during pregnancy and childbirth, which are major causes of maternal and child mortality in LMICs (36,37).
We found a higher likelihood of SBI among women who gave their most recent birth at the age of 19 or earlier. Our finding of a relatively high prevalence of SBI among younger women is similar to that reported in some studies conducted in LMICs (16,33,38,39). In most LMICs, many women marry before reaching 18. Younger women are sexually more active than older women. Also, younger women are generally more fertile (40), and at this early age, they are unaware of reproductive health, contraception, and the importance of birth spacing. Besides, the social norm plays a key role both in early marriage and service-seeking behaviour after pregnancy. For instance, many women avoid facility-based reproductive healthcare services, as they feel uncomfortable in seeking services from male providers and there is a shortage of female providers (41). Moreover, the literature suggests that very young women are likely to be economically disadvantaged, which may further restrict their access to and use of modern contraception and possibly explains this association (8,42).
This study found a lower likelihood of SBI among participants living in households headed by a woman. In our data, around 14% of households were headed by a woman. Although no study so far has explored the reasons for such association, there may have several explanations. First, women are usually more aware than men about pregnancy complication and their connection with SBI. They may have gained this awareness from their fertility experiences. If they are the heads, they may avoid SBI for themselves and/or recommend others in their households to avoid shorter intervals. Second, in some of these households, the study participants may have identified themselves as the heads because their husbands were living abroad. In such circumstances, they have a lower probability of getting pregnancies in short intervals. Third, if women identified themselves as the head of the households, then they may have been enjoying decision-making power about birth intervals and/or the use of contraception.
Consistent with studies conducted in some other LMICs (15,43), this study found that the well-off women were more likely to give birth in short intervals than the least well-off. Usually, less frequent (44,45) and less effective contraception use (44,45), no knowledge of emergency contraception (44), or the combinations of these contraception-using behaviours are more common among the less affluent women. These behaviours lead to a consistently higher risk of unintended pregnancy (41) and most of them in short intervals. Also, women’s knowledge and affordability of modern contraception use are linked to their economic status. Moreover, less affluent women usually have lower autonomy over their reproductive life and access to health facilities. Women of poor households are subject to religious and social norms that may restrict their movements in a male-dominated society. Indeed, several social determinants of health are interlinked and they both separately and together may affect women’s access to and use of modern contraception.
We found women’s experience of the death of a child born from their second recent pregnancy was a strong predictor of SBI. This association is consistent with previous findings of some studies conducted in LMICs (15,46–48) and there are at least two possible explanations for this. First, the death of an infant suddenly terminates breastfeeding (49–51). This, in turn, triggers the resumption of ovulation and thereby increases the exposure duration of a new conception. Second, a previous adverse outcome may have a “replacement effect” (52,53), which prompts women to soon get pregnant in an attempt to attain the desired number of surviving offspring at the end of their reproductive life. Third, depression from the experience of a child’s death may also make women unaware of or indifferent to contraception use.
The provision of modern contraceptives at the nearest health facility from women’s houses is a strong negative predictor of SBI. Also, the prevalence of SBI decreases with an increasing average distance of the nearest health facilities from women’s residences. These relationships are reasonable, as the provision increases the availability and the smaller distance increases the accessibility. Service convenience, particularly in the post-partum period when movement is considered risky, is crucial. Women in Bangladesh usually face restrictions in travelling long distances and these restrictions are linked with gender, community norms, transport and time barriers.
To our knowledge, this is the first study in the context of LMICs that examines the determinants of SBI using the linked population survey and health facility data. The linking of two national datasets enabled us to adjust the influence of health facility-level factors, including the availability of modern contraceptives and the average distance of women’s houses in the respective clusters from health facilities. These facility-level factors substantially determine the prevalence of SBI and often mediate the influence of individual-, household-, and community-level factors of SBI. Moreover, we used a robust statistical model-building technique and adjusted for individual-, household-, community-, and health facility-level confounders, which increased the precision of our findings. Thus, we believe, our findings will inform evidence-based policies and programs in Bangladesh and other LMICs in reducing the prevalence of SBI. However, a limitation of this study is its cross-sectional data; therefore, the associations are correlational rather than causal. To ensure the privacy of the respondents, the DHS displaced BDHS cluster locations up to five km in rural areas and two km in urban areas. This displacement may have changed the average distance of the nearest health facilities from women’s houses and other estimates presented in this study. However, the DHS ensured that the clusters are located in their original administrative division. Although this displacement may have changed the average distance of the nearest health facilities from women’s houses and other estimates presented in this study, this variation is likely to be random. Also, some women may have sourced contraceptives from health facilities located further away than closest ones and/or from private facilities.
Conclusion
This study found more than one-fourth of live births in Bangladesh occurred in short intervals. The prevalence of SBI was lower among women of relatively high ages, residing in the households headed by a female, and of the richest wealth quintile. The availability of modern contraceptives at the nearest health facility from women’s respective clusters is protective of SBI. Also, women’s experience of the death of their second most recent child is a strong predictor of SBI. Increased availability of modern contraceptives in all health facilities and targeted programs for women of younger ages or women who had adverse pregnancy experiences should be prioritized in the policies and programmes to reduce SBI and associated adverse outcomes. Further studies examining the geographical hotspots of SBI and associated factors may also help in targeted interventions.
Data Availability
The datasets used and analysed in this study are available from the Measure DHS website: https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm
Declaration of interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Authors’ contributions
MNK and MZI designed the study, performed the data analysis, and wrote the first draft of this manuscript. MMI and MMR critically reviewed and edited the previous versions of this manuscript. All authors approved this final version of the manuscript.
Data availability
The datasets used and analysed in this study are available from the Measure DHS website: https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm
Acknowledgement
The authors thank the MEASURE DHS for granting access to the 2011 and 2017/18 BDHS data.
References
