Abstract
Objectives To construct a diet-score measuring the level of adherence to the Healthy Reference Diet (HRD), to explore whether adherence to the HRD is associated with coronary heart disease (CHD), all-cause mortality risk, and to calculate its environmental impact.
Design Prospective cohort study.
Setting The Dutch contribution to the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-NL).
Participants 37,349 adults (20-70y) without CHD at baseline.
Main outcome measures Primary outcomes were incident CHD and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were greenhouse gas emission (GHGE), land use, blue water use, freshwater eutrophication, marine eutrophication, and terrestrial acidification.
Results During a median 15.3-year follow-up, 2,543 cases of CHD occurred, and 5,648 individuals died from all causes. The average HRD-score was 73 (SD=10). High adherence to the HRD was associated with a 15% lower risk of CHD (hazard ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.75 to 0.96), as well as a 17% lower risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.77 to 0.90) in multivariable-adjusted models. Better adherence to the HRD was associated with lower environmental impact from GHGE (β= -0.10 kg CO2-eq, 95% confidence interval -0.13 to -0.07), land use (β= -0.11 m2 per year, 95% confidence interval -0.12 to -0.09), freshwater eutrophication (β= -0.000002 kg P-eq, 95% confidence interval -0.000004 to -0.000001), marine eutrophication (β= -0.00035 kg N-eq, 95% confidence interval -0.00042 to -0.00029), and terrestrial acidification (β = -0.004 kg SO2-eq, 95% confidence interval -0.004 to -0.003), but with higher environmental impact from blue water use (β=0.044 m3, 95% confidence interval 0.043 to 0.045).
Conclusion High adherence to the HRD was associated with lower risk of CHD and all-cause mortality. Additionally, increasing adherence to the HRD could lower some aspects of the environmental impact of diets, but attention is needed for the associated increase in blue water use.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
MCH was supported by the Netherlands Cardiovascular Research Initiative, an initiative with support of the Dutch Heart Foundation (CVON2016-04) and The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (531003001) in the context of the Supreme Nudge project. Funders had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript, nor have they authority on the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University Medical Center Utrecht (Prospect) and the Medical Ethical Committee of the Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO) (MORGEN). All participants proved written informed consent.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos