Completion of electronic nursing documentation of inpatient admission assessment: insights from Australian metropolitan hospitals

1. Introduction

Admission marks the start of a patient’s journey in the hospital inpatient setting. Patient assessment is a foundational nursing function, which involves the systematic and continuous collection of patient clinical and historical information, documentation of collected data and communication with team members¹. Timely completion of necessary documents enables expedited team communication and facilitates quality patient care planning.² Failure to do so can jeopardise optimal care. In Australia, the National Safety and Quality Health Service (NSQHS)³ Communicating for Safety Standard emphasises that timely, purpose-driven, and effective communication and documentation supports continuous, coordinated and safe care for patients.

Electronic medical record (eMR) systems have the potential to improve the quality of healthcare, streamline clinical workflows and increase efficiency in the healthcare system^4-7. While the eMR has advantages, it also comes with disadvantages such as over-documentation, decreased speed of documentation, and the cost of implementation and maintenance⁸. The amount of time spent by nurses in electronic documentation is substantial and varies by nursing shifts, unit types, and unit activities^9-12. A Korean study demonstrated that completion of electronic documentation happens outside of working hours when nurses are new, working on a day shift, or when task-based activities are unpredictable¹¹.

There is limited research on nursing completion of electronic admission forms. Variations in healthcare form completion relating to age, sex, and clinical specialty have been reported.^13-15 Younger patient age has been shown to be linked to lower completion.^14,15 These studies explored factors relating to completion of a form, however the results related mostly to advanced care directives, rather than admission forms.^14-16 Research on form completion has focused on physician practices, paper-based processes and electronic documentation of nursing tasks as a whole, as opposed to a single foundational process such as admission. Little is understood about the factors influencing adult admission documentation and there are no studies describing timeliness of electronic nursing admission documentation.

Extracting knowledge from big data and process mining has been examined and promoted in recent years to inform the execution of workflow processes, check conformance with guidelines, and find improvement opportunities in healthcare and nursing.^17-21 This study focused on an electronic nursing admission assessment form which is one of the most common forms for communicating nursing care in Australia. This is important particularly because more Australian hospitals are moving towards fully adopting eMR-based technologies to manage patient care processes and multidisciplinary communication. The aim of this study was to explore and describe the timeliness of completing an electronic adult admission assessment form in a large Australian local health district, and identify factors associated with its completion. This provides data-driven insights into current nursing practice on electronic documentation of admission and informs future practice.

2. Materials and Methods

3. Results

3.1 Patient and facility characteristics

Patient characteristics of the sample are summarised in Table 1 and Figure 1.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1:

Length of stay for inpatient admission encounters (November 2018-2019)

***PLEASE USE COLOR FOR PRINTING FIGURE***

***figure showing first 50 days from time of admission

There were a total of 43 adult inpatient clinical units, located in hospital 1 (n=18 units), hospital 2 (n=19 units), and hospital 3 (n=6 units). Hospital 1 accounted for 43.8% (n=16,438) of the admissions, while hospital 2 and hospital 3 constituted 37.4% (n=14,012) and 18.8% (7,062) of the admissions respectively. The majority of admissions were to high-complexity units, including NHPPD 6 units (66.7%, n=25039) and NHPPD 5.5 (14.6%, n=5460).

3.2 Completion and timeliness

Overall, the form completion rate across the three hospitals in the local health district was 78.4%. Hospitals 1, 2, and 3 had completion rates of 70.9%, 79.2%, and 91.2% respectively. As seen in Figure 2, the majority of forms are completed (78%, n=22,953) within the first 24 hours of admission. Other forms are completed between 24-72 hours (13%, n=3,910) or after 72 hours (9%, n=2,558) from the time of admission.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2:

Timeliness of form completion

***PLEASE USE COLOR FOR PRINTING FIGURE***

4. Discussion

Completed nursing documentation of admission assessment in the eMR is important because it allows nursing staff to assess, document and communicate relevant information and plan patient care accordingly. It is very important that this is done in a timely manner because safe, efficient, high-quality healthcare delivery from clinicians requires up-to-date information and movement of clinical data across and between care settings and time¹². In acute/inpatient care settings, a clear overview of the patient is essential for multidisciplinary teams. Important relationships and trends might be overlooked if nurses are unable to document and view patient admission assessment data²⁶.

To our knowledge, this is the first study addressing electronic admission assessment form completion among nurses in Australia. The high rate of form completion suggests that the majority of nurses comply with this admission-related task. A majority of patients have an AAA form completed within the first 8 hours of admission. While there are presently no mandated (or agreed) acceptable completion timeframes, this finding aligns with the general expectation that admission documentation should be done at the beginning of the patient’s hospital journey. It has been shown that timely communication and adequate nursing assessment are keys in preventing harm, detecting early deterioration, communicating a patient’s initial problems and needs and promoting patient safety.^2,27

Though the high completion rates paint a fairly optimistic picture about electronic form completion, significant delays and non-completion rates were found for some admission encounters. Patient assessment is the primary reference for care planning and the start of the patient’s journey, yet in our study, one in five patients did not have an AAA form completed. This poses questions in relation to the process of care planning for acute care patients. Of those who had a form completed, almost a quarter were done 24 hours after admission, with 9% being done 5 days or more after a patient is admitted. The benefit of completing the form in the middle, or towards the end of a patient’s stay is questionable. In addition, this could suggest that the form may have been completed for administrative reasons rather than for patient care. This is counter to the principal purpose of nursing assessment and highlights a need for further education on the importance of timely documentation of patient assessment.

The inpatient admissions in this study were mostly from medical and surgical units. Urgency of direct patient care is a priority in these settings, staff busyness and/or patient acuity may compete with nurses’ inclination to complete electronic documentation. In a Middle Eastern study of factors contributing to nursing task incompletion, 780 medical and surgical nurses were surveyed and only 48% stated they could complete all the required procedures during their shift²⁸. It is possible that nurses complete admission documentation outside of their shifts, as found in a Korean study which showed that nurses often stayed back to complete electronic documentation¹¹. The round-the-clock nature of nursing shift work makes transitions and handovers vital to the completion of tasks, including admission documentation. It remains the case that while the eMR system could facilitate timely documentation, it should also be explored as a contributor to delays in form completion. The use of eMRs has been acknowledged as causative of work disruption, which may delay documentation of patient encounters²⁷.

Form completion was found to be associated with the time of admission encounter. Prior studies^12,29,30 have reported that the completion of electronic nursing documentation varies according to nursing shift, however, data in these studies were limited to only day and night shifts. Our study was able to address finer nursing shift arrangements that closely reflects our clinical practice (i.e. morning, evening, and night). In this study, evenings were the busiest shift, with nearly 43% of all inpatient admissions. This is similar to the findings of a North American study which explored nurse workload through clinical data, which revealed that the greatest activity in both the intensive care units and medical-surgical units occurred in the evening shift.³¹ Admission encounters during this time were also more likely to have a form completed, compared to those from a morning shift. In most public hospitals in New South Wales, the morning and evening shifts overlap as the former ends between 3pm and 4pm and the latter starts between 1pm and 2pm. This overlap of clinical staffing may contribute to increasing the likelihood of form completion during evening shift, as tasks are shared or delegated to incoming nurses. This study found that form completion was the lowest when patients were admitted in during the night shifts. This is consistent with a previous report that during night shifts, nurses spend less time in documentation than in day shifts.¹¹ This is also in line with the fact that patients rest at night and patient assessment should ideally be completed at the bedside, with the patient fully awake.

Form completion was less likely in critical care and high complexity clinical areas. This may be explained by the increased nursing workload in these units, particularly as they are situated in acute tertiary hospitals. In an ICU work audit study, there were an average 178 nursing activities per patient per day in an intensive care setting, with 84% of activities performed by a single nurse.³¹ It may be that high workload among nurses in these high acuity clinical areas is a contributor to lower documentation. Another reasonable hypothesis here may be an anecdotal view that ICU nurses could privilege direct verbal communication over documentation-based communication more than their medical/surgical unit-based colleagues. Further, the existence of a parallel ICU-specific eMR likely explains some of the strength of this association. However, the parallel eMR did not contain all descriptors canvassed by the Cerner AAA form/was concerned more with patient progress than AAA descriptors.

This study found that patient’s gender and age are not associated with form completion. This finding contrasts that of another Australian study, which identified patients’ age as a factor significantly associated with healthcare form completion rate and timely documentation.¹³ This study examined a goals of care form, a resuscitation planning tool completed by medical staff to document informed decisions of hospitalised patients. Unlike the form we studied, such form is suited to an age-specific patient population who may require end-of-life conversations or palliative care planning and this may explain the difference in findings between the two studies.

The strength of this study lies on robust findings generated by strong statistical power, inclusion of multiple clinical areas, and use of multilevel modelling analytic techniques which accounted for hierarchies in the data. Its focus on the documentation of a single nursing process provides better insight into clinical practice compared with other studies which refer to electronic nursing documentation as a whole, or focus on physician practices alone. The inpatient admission encounters and data for analysis in this study were derived from an existing eMR audit report for the AAA form, so the variables included for analysis were limited. Nursing staff education on eMR use and practice variations could have influenced form completion, however such information was not available and lay outside the scope of this study. Future studies linking eMR data with reported critical incidents or harm to address outcomes of non-completion of the AAA form are recommended. Other patient-related characteristics such as Aboriginality, language spoken, primary diagnosis, or discharge disposition may provide additional insights into the factors influencing electronic form completion and nursing admission assessment.

This study investigated the timeliness of completing an electronic AAA form in a metropolitan Australian health district, and identified factors associated with its completion. Overall, form completion was high and often performed within the first 24 hours of hospital admission. Despite this, some patients did not have a form completed or form completion was significantly delayed. The time of admission, length of stay, and nursing hours per patient day in a unit were factors found to influence the completion of an AAA. More emphasis needs to be placed on the importance of completing the AAA form in a timely manner, as this informs initial care planning for the patient’s hospital stay. Education among nursing staff, exploration of reasons for form completion delay, and standardisation of nursing admission guidelines and eMR use are recommended for future practice.

Authors’ contributions

DRS, GF, and DTT designed the study, performed the statistical analysis, and interpreted findings. DRS collected the data and wrote R code for cleaning and analysis. AJ contributed to interpretation of findings and provided executive support. All authors reviewed the final manuscript.