ABSTRACT
Background The concept of sigma metrics & lean six sigma is well known in the field of healthcare. However not many labs utilize the six sigma metrics for maintenance of high quality laboratory performance. A minimum value of 3 σ is desired in any clinical laboratory & values of σ≥ 6 are regarded as gold standard for obtaining high quality lab reports.
Aims &Objectives To calculate bias, cv & sigma metrics from the IQC & EQC data in order to ascertain extent of quality management in our lab.
Materials &Methods An extensive study of sample processing and quality practices was carried out in the Central Laboratory of Department of Biochemistry; PGIMER &Dr. RML Hospital, New Delhi; from Feb 2020 to July 2020. The IQC used(both level I & level II) were from Biorad Laboratories India (lyphochek assayed chemistry control) & the EQC used was from Randox Laboratories, UK. All the controls were run on Beckman Coulter clinical chemistry analyser AU 680. Total 14 clinical parameters were analysed & subsequently; Mean, S.D., CV, bias & σ were calculated through their respective formulas.
Results Sigma level was more than 6 for both levels of IQC was observed for Amylase. It indicates world class performance. Total bilirubin, AST, Triglyceride & HDL depicted σ values between 3.1 – 6 for both L1 & L2. Iron showed σ value of 5.5 in L1 whereas it was 3.78 in L2.
Conclusion Sigma metrics in clinical laboratory is an essential technique to ascertain poor assay performance, along with assessment of the efficiency of existing laboratory process.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No funding received
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study does not use any human samples.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The tables containing the monthly IQC and EQC comparisons is added.
