Abstract
In sectors like healthcare, having classification models that are both reliable and accurate is vital. Regrettably, contemporary classification techniques employing machine learning disregard the correlations between instances within data. This research, to rectify this, introduces a basic but effective technique for converting tabulated data into data graphs, incorporating structural correlations. Graphs have a unique capacity to capture structural correlations between data, allowing us to gain a deeper insight in comparison to carrying out isolated data analysis. The suggested technique underwent testing once the integration of graph data structure-related elements had been carried out and returned superior results to testing solely employing original features. The suggested technique achieved validity by returning significantly improved levels of accuracy.
Data The extracted graph topological features datasets are available from:
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Self-funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Big Data Analytics Center, UAE University.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data sets used in this study are publically available online either from Kaggle (https://www.kaggle.com/) or UCI Machine Learning Repository (https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/)
D1-Pima Indians Diabetes Dataset: https://www.kaggle.com/uciml/pima-indians-diabetes-database
D2-Stroke Prediction Dataset: https://www.kaggle.com/fedesoriano/stroke-prediction-dataset
D3-Heart Attack Analysis and Prediction Dataset: https://www.kaggle.com/rashikrahmanpritom/heart-attack-analysis-prediction-dataset/metadata
D4-Hepatocellular Carcinoma dataset: https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/HCV+data
https://www.kaggle.com/uciml/pima-indians-diabetes-database
https://www.kaggle.com/fedesoriano/stroke-prediction-dataset
https://www.kaggle.com/rashikrahmanpritom/heart-attack-analysis-prediction-dataset/metadata
Abbreviations
- ML
- Machine learning
- DL
- Deep learning
- DDA
- Drug-disease association
- DDI
- Drug-drug interaction
- LR
- Logistic regression
- SVM
- Support vector machines
- RF
- Random forest
- NN
- Neural network
- NB
- Naïve Bayes
- KNN
- k-nearest neighbor
- DT
- Decision tree
- GCN
- Convolutional graph network
- OF
- Original features
- GTF
- Graph topological features
- SF
- Selected features