Whole blood-based measurement of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses reveals asymptomatic infection and vaccine efficacy in healthy subjects and patients with solid organ cancers

Background

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, there is an increasing focus on understanding how adaptive immune responses generated from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and/or vaccination provide protection from future infection. Although the exact determinants of effective immunity from re-infection with SARS-CoV-2 remain to be deciphered, multiple recent studies have revealed that virus-specific T cell responses develop in nearly all individuals with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (1-4), with responses persisting for at least six months post-infection (5). Traditional means of assessing viral antigen-specific T cell responses utilise flow cytometry or ELISpot-based readouts; however, neither approach is standardisable across multiple laboratories, cost-effective, or amenable to high-throughput processing, thus precluding their use for larger scale population immunity screen. In addition, current commercially available immunoassays that detect cellular immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 solely measure IFN-γ released by antigen-specific T cells (6), even though other T_H1-type cytokines may be better indicators of anti-viral response (5). To overcome these limitations, existing whole blood-based in vitro immunodiagnostics, such as those used for measuring Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific T cell responses (7), can be adapted to measure virus-specific T cell responses in a high-throughput, standardisable manner. Specifically, this T cell immunoassay measures cytokines in the plasma released by antigen-specific T cells following stimulation with specific peptides spanning antigenic regions of the pathogen. This approach is gaining recognition as a potentially powerful diagnostic tool for managing the COVID-19 pandemic (8-10).

Monitoring immunological responses to SARS-CoV-2 is of particular importance amongst the elderly and immunosuppressed, given the significantly higher mortality rates observed in these groups (11). Recent studies have associated higher rates of COVID-19 morbidity and mortality with sub-optimal adaptive immune responses (12). The incidence of cancer is also increased in the elderly where a declining adaptive immune system, as well as age-associated inflammation, are factors in disease progression. Given that influenza vaccines induce weaker immune responses in the elderly and in cancer patients (13, 14), measuring adaptive immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 in vaccinated individuals belonging to these groups is important. Indeed, early indications suggest that cancer patients, in particular those on active treatments such as chemotherapy, were significantly less likely to mount antibody and T cell responses to the Pfizer-BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine, (15).

Here, we adapted and optimised a widely utilised in vitro whole blood stimulation assay to determine the presence of SARS-CoV-2-specific T_H1-type (IFN-γ / IL-2) cellular immune responses in healthy donors, to assess T cell responses generated from prior infection, whether the participant was symptomatic or not, and as a readout of vaccine efficacy amongst healthy donors and cancer patients. We demonstrate high sensitivity and specificity of this assay to identify or exclude prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or successful COVID-19 vaccination. Going forward, it is imperative to utilise such tests to understand the precise contribution of T cell responses with regards to long-term immunity to SARS-CoV-2 infection, in particular amongst immunocompromised individuals.

Methods

Results

Prior analysis of the SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell cytokine profile, measured in supernatants of ex vivo peptide-stimulated ELISpot cultures or whole blood assays, revealed that T_H1-type IFN-γ⁺ and IL-2⁺ responses dominate effective, functional SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses (5, 10). The magnitude of T_H1-type responses generated to the SARS-CoV-2 S-/NP-/M-combined peptide pool was assessed amongst healthy donor participants who had either received a prior vaccination (n = 52), a confirmed prior infection (n = 15) (PCR positive swab from nasopharynx or saliva sample and/or a strong history of infection with positive measured antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2) or no known history of infection (n = 88). Highly significant differential IFN-γ-positive and IL-2-positive SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses were seen amongst vaccinated or previously infected (non-vaccinated) COVID-19-positive individuals in comparison to unknown/naïve individuals (Figure 1A; P < 0.0001 and Figure 1B; P < 0.0001, respectively). There was no significant difference in the magnitude of IFN-γ or IL-2 production between vaccinated and infected participants (Figure 1A and 1B, respectively). Amongst all vaccinated, infected or unknown/naïve participants, there were highly significant correlations between IFN-γ and IL-2 production, despite a propensity for increased (>20 pg/ml) IFN-γ⁺ SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses without a measurable IL-2 response amongst unknown/naïve donors (Figure 1C).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1. SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell response identifies prior asymptomatic infection.

IFN- (A) and IL-2 (B) release in response to the SARS-CoV-2 S-/NP-/M-combined peptide pool was measured in 156 evaluable participants, subdivided into those with prior COVID-19 vaccination (grey, n = 52), prior COVID-19-positive PCR test result (blue, n = 12-15), or those with no prior positive COVID-19 test, termed ‘unknown/naïve’ (orange, n = 88). Statistical analyses indicate the results of a Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s correction for multiple comparisons (**** P < 0.0001). (C) The SARS-CoV-2-specific IL-2⁺ T cell response was correlated with the IFN-γ⁺ response, subdivided by participant status. The anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgG antibody titre was correlated with the magnitude of IFN-γ⁺ T cell response (D) and IL-2⁺ T cell response (E), with identified asymptomatic participants highlighted. Results of regression analyses are indicated. Sensitivity and specificity readouts for IFN-γ (F) and IL-2 (G) were defined by receiver operating characteristic curves. Area under the curve (AUC) and associated P value are indicated.

Next, we correlated participant T cell responses with anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgG antibodies. There was a strong concordance, albeit not significant correlation, between the presence of both cellular and humoral immune responses in all vaccinated and previously infected participants: only 1/15 (6.7%) previously infected participant had a positive antibody response (>0.27) without a measurable IFN-γ ⁺ or IL-2⁺ T cell response. All 52 vaccinated participants demonstrated a measurable IFN-γ⁺or IL-2⁺ T cell response, although two were antibody negative (<0.27) (Figures 1D and 1E). To investigate whether the increased T cell responses observed amongst naïve/unknown participants with no history of confirmed infection was indicative of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, we further compared the magnitude of IFN-γ ⁺or IL-2⁺ T cell responses with evidence of antibody seroconversion; a significant correlation between T cell response and the magnitude of anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgG antibodies was noted for unknown/naïve participants (IFN-γ : P = 0.0002, Figure 1D; IL-2: P = 0.0010, Figure 1E). Ten such participants were identified as having both a positive antibody response (>0.27) and raised (above median) IFN-γ ⁺T cell response, as indicated (Figure 1D), and eight participants also had a positive antibody and increased IL-2⁺ T cell response (Figure 1E), consistent with the adaptive immune responses generated in the majority of vaccinated or previously infected participants. Given these participants self-reported no prior confirmed COVID-19 test or symptoms associated with COVID-19 during the pandemic, the presence of both a SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell and antibody response is highly indicative of prior asymptomatic infection.

When assessing the utility of measuring SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses to identify those who have received prior COVID-19 vaccination and/or been previously infected, Youden’s index revealed an optimal cut-off value of >23.55 pg/ml IFN-γ, achieving a sensitivity of 93.59% (95% CI 85.9-97.2%) and specificity of 80.8% (95% CI 70.7-88.0%) (AUC = 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.98); P < 0.0001; Figure 1F).

Measuring IL-2⁺ T cell response as the readout adjusted the sensitivity and specificity to 96.0% (95% CI 88.8-98.9%) and 93.9% (95% CI 86.5-97.4%), respectively, at an optimal cut-off value of >20.17 pg/ml IL-2 (AUC = 0.96 (95% CI 0.93-1.00); P < 0.0001; Figure 1G).

Next, we further evaluated eleven non-vaccinated COVID-19-positive convalescent participants reporting mild to moderate severity of associated symptoms, and ten non-vaccinated participants reporting no prior associated symptoms and for whom both IFN-γ and IL-2 data was available (Figure 2A), to determine the functionality of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells induced by prior asymptomatic infection. The magnitude of IFN-γ production was reduced in asymptomatic participants (P = 0.061, Figure 2A and 2B); furthermore, a significant reduction in IL-2 production was noted (P = 0.0011, Figure 2A and 2C). When assessing all T_H1 responses by participant infection and symptom status and using optimal cut-offs defined above to identify positive responses, dual-producing IFN-γ⁺/IL-2⁺ SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses were present in 10/11 (90.9%) of symptomatic participants, reducing to 7/10 (70.0%) amongst asymptomatic participants (Figure 2D). Given the diminished nature of the SARS-CoV-2-specific T_H1-type cytokine production in asymptomatic donors, both IFN-γ and IL-2 are equally useful readouts when assessing for the presence of T cell responsiveness.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2. Asymptomatic participants exhibit reduced SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell functionality.

(A) IFN-γ and IL-2 T cell responses amongst eleven symptomatic and 10 asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2-infected donors is shown for each individual. IFN-γ (B) and IL-2 (C) release by T cells in response to the SARS-CoV-2 S-/NP-/M-combined peptide pool was measured in the symptomatic, asymptomatic and naïve donors (n = 76). P values resulting from Mann Whitney tests are shown (** P < 0.01). The proportion of symptomatic, asymptomatic and naïve participants mounting dual IFN-γ⁺/IL-2⁺, single IFN-γ or IL-2⁺ or no measurable T cell response is shown (D).

SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses amongst unknown / naïve participants, i.e. those with no measurable anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgG antibodies and no prior confirmed history of infection, were rare, with 3/76 (3.8%) displaying a dual IFN-γ⁺/IL-2⁺ response and 12/76 (15.8%) displaying an IFN-γ⁺/IL-2^- response. This could be indicative of pre-existing, cross-reactive T cells, or a terminally differentiated effector T cell response. However, further studies are required to ascertain whether those participants with raised anti-SARS-CoV-2-specific T_H1 responses without seroconversion have been infected by SARS-CoV-2. Interestingly, this discordant immune response has also been reported when monitoring intra-familial exposure to the virus (20).

Finally, we tracked T cell and antibody responses pre- and post-single dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccination amongst a cohort of healthy controls and a cohort of cancer patients with solid tumours. Robust priming of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells was observed amongst healthy controls, with 28/29 (96.6%) mounting an IFN-γ ⁺ response >23.55 pg/ml (Figure 3A) and 20/22 (90.9%) mounting IL-2⁺ responses >20.17 pg/ml (Figure 3B). In contrast, only 27/56 (48.2%) and 18/31 (58.1%) of cancer patients mounted an IFN-γ (Figure 3A) or IL-2 (Figure 3B) response following single dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, respectively. Furthermore, anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgG antibody responses were also compromised in cancer patients though to a lesser degree than the T cell response, with 42/54 (77.8%) of cancer patients vs. 27/28 (96.4%) of healthy controls reaching the threshold of positivity in our antibody test (Figure 3C). This may reflect a limitation of the whole blood-based SARS-CoV-2 T cell assay in that insufficient numbers of lymphocytes may be present to detect such a response; this may be a particular problem in cancer given that lymphopenia is a common occurrence. However, such a situation is also likely to hamper the induction of long-term T cell memory formation.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 3. Utilising SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell response measurements as a readout for COVID-19 vaccine efficacy amongst healthy donor and cancer patient cohorts.

IFN-γ⁺(A) and IL-2⁺ (B) SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses and anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgG levels (C) were measured before and 3-6 weeks after a single COVID-19 vaccination in healthy donors and cancer patients. Two-tailed P values resulting from Mann Whitney tests are shown. (D) Vaccination response rates (NR = no response, R = response) in terms of positive T cell (IFN-γ, IL-2) or antibody (RBD IgG) response amongst each cohort is shown. P values indicate results from Fisher’s exact test.

Overall, these data highlight the power of measuring SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses as a means for identifying prior COVID-19 infection, vaccination efficacy and/or potential future immunity from re-infection status.

Discussion

This study demonstrates the utility of a high-throughput, standardisable T cell immunoassay to accurately detect SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses. In order to control future outbreaks and identify at-risk individuals, the exact constituents of effective COVID-19 immunity at a population level must be understood. When used alongside measurements of virus-specific antibodies, T cell response readouts represent a powerful, additional measure of potential immunity from COVID-19, with a higher degree of confidence than either measurement on their own, in particular given the concern on the longevity of measurable antibody responses (21-23). In addition, the FDA’s decision to issue emergency use authorisation for a SARS-CoV-2 T cell test highlights the growing acceptance and usefulness of T cell testing for the clinical management of certain patient groups (24).

Here, we show that measuring plasma T_H1-type effector cytokines from SARS-CoV-2 peptide-stimulated whole blood can accurately detect the presence of a cellular immune response to SARS-CoV-2, distinguishing those who have received prior vaccination and/or infection from uninfected healthy donors with a high degree of sensitivity and, in particular for IL-2, specificity. These results are consistent with comprehensive analyses of the cytokine profile released by SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells measured in whole blood-based assays or ELISpot / cell culture supernatants, which showed that IL-2 and IFN-γ are the dominant cytokines (5, 10, 25). However, the relevance of an IFN-γ-positive, IL-2-negative SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell response in uninfected donors with respect to long-term immunity requires further investigation. The peptides used in our immunoassay predominantly stimulate CD4⁺ T cell responses, and cover all major immunodominant regions of the virus, including those in the spike, membrane and nucleocapsid proteins, as recently defined (26). T_H1-type responses to these immunogenic regions were detected in the vast majority of convalescent SARS-CoV-2 infected and/or vaccinated individuals, in keeping with prior findings (26, 27), although convalescent asymptomatic donors and a minority of naïve individuals demonstrate low-level reactivity. Prior studies have revealed the functionality and magnitude of adaptive immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 were significantly lower in mild cases of COVID-19 in comparison to severe (5), potentially the result of lower viral loads (27, 28). In accordance with this, our study revealed that production of IFN-γ and IL-2 was lower in COVID-19-convalescent asymptomatic participants. However, a recent longitudinal analysis of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection identified an increased, highly functional IFN-γ and IL-2 response within 3 months of infection that declined faster than in symptomatic individuals (10). Differences in post-infection sampling times likely account for the discrepancy in associations between SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses and COVID-19 symptom severity, given that the majority of our participants were infected ∼6 months prior to blood sampling. However, it is encouraging to note that T cell responses were still present and functional over this timeframe in nearly all SARS-CoV-2-infected convalescent and/or vaccinated participants, even in those up to 12 months post-infection, corresponding well with prior studies describing the longevity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 T cell immunity (5). Whether these responses provide immune protection, especially to new emerging mutant variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, warrants further investigation in larger prospective cohorts. In addition, further downstream analyses incorporating other coronaviruses and additional antigenic regions are necessary to ascertain whether cross-reactive T cell responses play a role in SARS-CoV-2 immunity.

Future studies are on-going to evaluate the durability of these measured T cell responses in our participants, comparing healthy subjects with immunocompromised patients, such as those with cancer. After the first dose of vaccine in cancer patients, a significantly weaker induction of cellular and, to a lesser extent, humoral responses was found, corroborating similar observations in other studies (15). These data provide further support to recent calls for cancer patients to be prioritised for booster vaccines and longer-term immunological monitoring.

In summary, we describe an immunoassay that accurately and rapidly identifies the presence of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses, both helping to elucidate the adaptive immune status of previously infected and/or vaccinated individuals, and diagnosing previously unsuspected past infection. Incorporating qualitative T cell response data in population immunity studies, or individualised certifications of immunity, could have far reaching implications for government policy on lockdown restrictions, and more effectively assess vaccine efficacy in communities, highlighting the potential requirement for repeat vaccinations where immunity wanes.

Funding

This work was funded by two UKRI COVID-19 National Core Study Immunity programmes (‘Coordinating COVID-19 asymptomatic testing programmes in university settings: providing insight on acquired immunity across the student population’ (to AnG, LF, MW and ADW), and ‘SARS-CoV-2 Optimal Cellular Assays’ (to AnG). Additional funding was provided by the MRC, as part of the UK Coronavirus Immunology Consortium (to BPM), and Cancer Research Wales (to MJS, MSS and AnG). AnG is supported by additional grant funding from the Wellcome Trust (grant code 209213/Z/17/Z). AwG is supported by additional grant funding from Cancer Research UK. BPM is supported additional funding by from the UK Dementia Research Institute Cardiff. WMZ is supported by a Health and Care Research Wales Fellowship from the Welsh Government. SEAB is supported by the Wales Cancer Research Centre.

Conflict of Interest

MJS is a founder of and holds equity in ImmunoServ Ltd. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.