Abstract
Objective Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) appears to be more common among women than men, though the underlying reasons for this remain unclear. In a community sample of young adults (n=996, aged 18-30) assessed during the COVID-19 pandemic, we investigated gendered patterns in NSSI etiology.
Methods Mediation and moderation analyses considered associations between past-year NSSI prevalence, gender, and putative mechanistic variables: self-reported psychological distress (K10), emotion dysregulation (DERS), and impulsivity (UPPS-P).
Results Nearly twice as many women as men reported past-year NSSI (14.47% versus 7.78%). Women reported significantly higher psychological distress and significantly lower sensation seeking and positive urgency than men. Psychological distress partially statistically mediated the relationship between gender and past-year NSSI. Gender did not significantly moderate associations between self-reported distress, emotion dysregulation, or impulsivity and past-year NSSI. Past-year NSSI prevalence did not significantly decrease with age and we found no significant age by gender interaction.
Conclusions Greater levels of NSSI in young women are explained by their greater levels of emotional distress. Women do not appear to be more likely than men to report NSSI due to differences in how they manage emotional distress: gender did not moderate the association between psychological distress and past-year NSSI, and there were no gender differences in emotion dysregulation or negative urgency. Furthermore, we show that NSSI remains prevalent beyond adolescence. Early interventions which reduce distress or improve distress tolerance, strengthen emotion regulation skills, and provide alternative coping strategies merit investigation for NSSI.
Highlights
Young women were significantly more likely to report past-year NSSI than young men
Psychological distress partially mediated the relationship between gender and NSSI
Gender did not moderate associations between putative mechanistic variables and NSSI
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The research was supported by a strategic award from the Wellcome Trust to the University of Cambridge and University College London (095844/Z/11/Z), and a Clinical Fellowship from the Wellcome Trust awarded to Prof Chamberlain (reference 110049/Z/15/Z & A). Additional support was provided by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre and NIHR ARC EoE. ETB is an NIHR Senior Investigator and PBJ an NIHR Senior Investigator Emeritus. SN was funded by the Cundill Center for Child and Youth Depression.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval for the current study was provided by the Cambridge East Research Ethics Committee (reference number 16/EE/0260, project: Intermediate phenotypes of impulsivity and compulsivity, Chief Investigator SRC) following the Declaration of Helsinki.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author
