Quality of Cervical Cancer Screening at a Family Health Unit in Salvador-BA

Julita Maria Freitas Coelho; Jamilly Souza Da Silva; Letícia Fonsêca Santos; Lyvia Mirelle Carneiro França; Gláucia Alencar Ponte; Lorena Moura De Assis Sampaio; Caroline Ramalho Galvão; Lorena Ramalho Galvão; Bruna Matos Santos Dantas; Sarah Dos Santos Conceição; Érica Velasco Dias Gomes; Maria Emília Cirqueira Silva; Ana Clara Silva Oliveira; Caroline Santos Silva

doi:10.1101/2021.05.31.21257712

ABSTRACT

Introduction Cytopathological examination is the main method for the screening of cervical cancer, its occurrence can be prevented or minimized through screening, with good coverage, quality of collection and analysis and women’s adherence to the examination.

Objective To describe the quality of cytopathological exams performed at a family health unit in Salvador - Bahia during the years 2015 and 2016.

Method A cross-sectional study, of an exploratory descriptive character, was conducted, using a database from a previous study carried out in a health unit in Salvador / BA and approved by the Ethical Committee from State University of Feira de Santana.

Results Preventive gynecological exams of 1,350 women were analyzed, but 330 (24.4%) of them could not be evaluated due to the absence of the report in the health unit and the presence of acellular or hypocellular material that prevented the analysis. From 1020 exams, 45 (3.3%) presented an unsatisfactory sample, without conditions for analysis, while 589 (43.19%) showed only squamous cells. From 392 (29.0%) reports with an adequate study sample, 150 (%) were women with a mean age of 38.49 years. These were located and composed the final sample of the present investigation.

Final Considerations We suggest the need for investments in continuing education for professionals involved in performing cytopathological exams, in order to ensure the right of women to comprehensive and quality health care.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The authors declare that there was no financing for the execution of this work, nor did they receive payment or services from third parties for any aspect of the submitted work.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the State University of Feira de Santana (No. 2,548,705).

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes