Abstract
The rapid international spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus 19 led to unprecedented attempts to develop and administer an effective vaccine. However, there is considerable vaccine hesitancy in some countries. We investigated willingness to vaccinate in three nations with historically different levels of vaccine willingness and attitudes: Israel, Japan and Hungary. Employing an ecological-systems approach we analysed associations between demographic factors and health status, individual cognitions, normative pressures, trust in government, belief in COVID-19 myths and willingness to be vaccinated, using data from three nationally representative samples (Israel, N=1011 (Jan 2021); Japan, N= 997 (Feb 2021); Hungary, N=1131 (Apr 2021)). In Israel 74% indicated a willingness to vaccinate, but only 51% in Japan and 31% in Hungary. Multigroup regression analyses indicated greater vaccine willingness amongst those who perceived benefits to vaccination, anticipated regret if not vaccinated and trusted the government. Multi-group latent class analysis of ten COVID-19 (mis)beliefs identified three classes of myths, with concerns about the alteration of DNA (Israel), allergies (Hungary) and catching COVID-19 from the vaccine (Japan) specific to vaccine willingness for each culture. Intervention campaigns should focus on increasing trust and addressing culturally specific myths while emphasising the individual and social group benefits of vaccination.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Funding for the study in Israel was awarded to Prof. Ben-Ezra from Ariel University No. RA2000000522 in Japan to Professor Masahito Takahashi (JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 18K01963) and in Hungary to Drs. Lan Anh Nguyen Lu and Monika Kovacs (National Excellence Programme 2018-1.2.1-NKP-2018-00006).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was from Ariel University Institutional Review Board (No. AU-SOC-MBE-20201224) the Yamaguchi University Review Committee for Non-Medical Research Involving Human Participants (2020-004-01) and the Eotvos Lorand University ethical review panel (PPK KEB 2021/130-2)
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the Open Science Framework (OSF) repository, and can be accessed here: https://osf.io/dm587/.
