ABSTRACT
Countries around the world have introduced travel restrictions to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission. As vaccines are gradually rolled out, attention has turned to when travel restrictions and other non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) can be relaxed. Here, using SARS-CoV-2 as a case study, we develop a mathematical branching process model to assess the risk that, following the removal of NPIs, cases introduced into new locations initiate a local outbreak. Our model accounts for changes in background population immunity due to vaccination. We consider two locations in which the vaccine rollout has progressed quickly – specifically, the Isle of Man (a British crown dependency in the Irish Sea) and the country of Israel. Rather than aiming to make exact quantitative predictions about the outbreak risk in different locations, we instead use data from these locations to demonstrate the general principle that the outbreak risk is unlikely to be eliminated completely when travel restrictions and other NPIs are removed in low prevalence settings. This conclusion holds even once vaccine programmes are completed. Key factors underlying these results are the potential for transmission even following vaccination, incomplete vaccine uptake, and the recent emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants with increased transmissibility. Combined, these factors suggest that when travel restrictions are relaxed, it will still be necessary to implement surveillance of incoming passengers to identify infected individuals quickly. This measure, as well as tracing and testing (and/or isolating) contacts of detected infected passengers, should remain in place to suppress potential outbreaks until case numbers globally are reduced.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
RS-P is supported by the EPSRC through the Centre for Doctoral Training in Industrially Focussed Mathematical Modelling at the University of Oxford (grant EP/L015803/1), in collaboration with Biosensors Beyond Borders Ltd. LD was supported by the MRC through the COVID-19 Rapid Response Rolling Call (grant MR/V009761/1) and by UKRI through the JUNIPER modelling consortium (grant MR/V038613/1). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, preparation of the manuscript or the decision to publish.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N/A
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Revised version of the Main Text and Supplementary Information following review.
Data Availability
Links to all vaccination data are included in the manuscript.
