Predictors of SARS CoV-2 Infection Among Healthcare Workers: The Impact of Community-Hospital Gradient

Introduction

After its emergence in Wuhan, China in 2019¹, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spread to world and claimed more than 3 millions of lives up to middle of 2021². Since the beginning of the pandemic, healthcare workers (HCWs) are under increased workload and are facing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the frontlines.

Protection of HCWs from the infection is strategic for the management of the pandemic. Therefore, since the beginning of the pandemic, HCWs were screened for viral RNA and antibody levels to detect the level of infection and also to determine the risk factors among HCWs. In seroprevalence studies, being black^3-9, being male^8,10,11, working as frontline worker ^11-15, working in emergency department^7,9, intensive care unit¹⁶, and laboratory¹³ were reported to be associated with higher risk of infection. The availability of PPE is also important because shortage of PPE increases the risk of infection⁸. Some studies reported that non-occupational risk factors such as household contact can increase seropositivity^5,9,17,18. However, there is no consensus on the risk factors yet.

Detailed and well-designed studies are needed to develop policies for protection of HCWs. By this study, we aimed to determine the level of SARS-CoV-2 infection among HCWs and describe the predictive factors of pre-vaccination era.

Materials and Methods

Results

1732 out of 1925 (90%) HCWs responded and volunteered to participate in the study, 67.3% was female and the median age was 28 (min 18 and max 66). By the end of 2020, the rate of seroprevalence was found to be 15% among HCW before the vaccination era.

The comorbidities were reported in 4.4% of the HCWs. Presence of any comorbidity was associated with infection (p = 0.043, Table 1). The professional distribution was dominated by nurses (48.5%) and physicians (11.7%) in the hospital. In univariate analysis, being a medical secretary or janitorial staff are found to be associated with infection (Table 1).

For occupational risk factors, working in the pandemic ward is not associated with infection. However, inappropriate use of PPE by HCWs despite patients wearing masks is associated with increased risk of infection. On the other hand, proper use of PPE in HCW performing intubation is associated with decreased risk of infection. Additionally, having more than three years of experience in the hospital is found to be associated with decreased risk of infection, whereas contact with a COVID-19 patient is associated with increased risk.

There are three non-occupational risk factors investigated in this study. In univariate analysis, using public transportation is not associated with infection (p=0.194). However, presence of diagnosed COVID-19 patient in household and household size are both significantly (p<0.001) associated with infection.

In multivariate analysis, being janitorial staff (OR:2.24, CI:1.21-4.14, p=0.011), being medical secretary (OR: 4.17, CI: 2.12-8.18, p<0.001), having at least one household member with COVID-19 diagnosis (OR:8.98, CI: 6.64-12.15, p<0.001) and number of household members >3 (OR:1.67, CI:1.26-2.22, p<0.001) were found to be significantly associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection (Table 2).

Discussion

By this screening study among HCWs that was performed before the era of vaccinations and variants, we investigated the risk factors associated with COVID-19 infection. We detected that being medical secretary (OR: 4.17, CI: 2.12-8.18, p<0.001) or janitorial staff (OR:2.24, CI:1.21-4.14, p=0.011) were associated with increased risk of infection (Table 2). This increase was not caused by the lack of PPE since all HCWs in the hospital were provided with necessary masks, shields, gowns, and other protective equipment where necessary. Informative seminars and posters about SARS-CoV-2 infection were provided to the clinical HCWs, however critical health literacy¹⁹ might not be achieved among medical secretaries and janitorial staff. In this context, health information clarity should be improved, furthermore, psychological and sociological determinants should be examined for all.

In our study, among the occupational risk factors, contact with COVID-19 patients and inappropriate use of PPE were found to be associated with increased risk of infection. On the other hand, working experience and contact to intubated ICU patient with PPE decreases the risk. These findings suggest that transmission of SARS-CoV-2 can be blocked with appropriate use of PPE. In the settings where PPE are readily available and HCWs are trained against SARS-CoV-2 transmission, occupational transmission could be minimized. We suggest the term “community-hospital gradient” to explain the shift from occupational transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to community acquired form. Community-hospital gradient suggests a more dynamic model and it can be used to express the discrepancy in the literature where some studies^5,9,17,18 reveal risk factors suggesting transmission from community, whereas others^11-16 highlights an occupational transmission. Community-hospital gradient favors hospital transmission in the setting of strict community control of SARS-CoV-2 by mask mandates and full lockdowns, along with lack of protective measures in the hospital caused by increased workload and sub-optimal PPE provision. Nevertheless, it can favor community transmission for hospitals where PPE and infection control are provided in the hospital, yet community-level measures are less strict and social setting promotes close contact.

Community-hospital gradient was shifted towards community transmission in the setting of this study and no occupational risk factor was significantly associated with increased infection in multivariate analysis. In contrast, household size and diagnosed patient in the household was associated with increased risk of infection. It should be noted that household size is not studied in the previous literature, although household contact was associated with increased risk by several studies^5,9,17,18.

Gender and age were studied as demographic risk factors for disease. However, no statistically significant association was found. Some studies in the literature suggest that male gender is a risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 infection^8,10,11. Although other studies^{3-6,9,12-14,17,18,20-25} have failed to show any significant association which is parallel to our findings. It should be noted that HCWs belong to working population in which the median age and maximum age is lower than the general population. Therefore, the low power of our study, with small sample of older HCWs might not be sufficient to reach the statistical significance.

Similarly, participants with comorbidities constitutes only 4.4% of the studied population showing HCW population studied is healthier than the general population. Although having at least one comorbidity is associated with increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in univariate analysis, low number of participants with chronic disease (77 participants) decreases the capacity to demonstrate any association with each comorbidity, separately. In studies with large sample sizes, some could not show the risk associated with infection^8,11. On the other hand, Delmas et Al. suggests that diabetes is associated with higher seroprevalence (OR: 1.78, CI: 1.04–3.03)²⁴, whereas, Goenka et Al. argues cardiovascular diseases are associated with lower seroprevalence (OR: 0.38, CI: 0.15-0.96)²¹.

Strong part of our study was inclusion of 90% of the HCWs in the hospital to avoid selection bias. On the other hand, there were two main limitations of this study. The first one is the recall bias of participants. We limited recall bias by completing the surveys before serological and PCR testing, and also by using the recording system of occupational health unit. Another limitation is that this study covers only one hospital in Turkey and results may have been affected by hospital and country specific characteristics.

Conclusion

By the end of 2020, just before the era of vaccination and variants, seroprevalence was 15% among HCWs. Medical secretary and janitorial staff were under increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, because of their exposure in the community or being neglected since they were not in the frontline. Increasing risk in larger households and households with diagnosed COVID-19 patient indicates community acquired transmission of the infection. Community-hospital gradient favors community transmission in case of adequate measures being implemented in the hospital and insufficient community regulations.