Modified Preparation Method of Ideal Platelet-Rich Fibrin Matrix (PRFM) from Whole Blood

1. Introduction

Otorhinolaryngologist specialists in plastic reconstruction have reported successful use of exogenous growth factors and PRP in clinical settings. Sclafani reported that the release of growth factors in wound healing was primarily carried out by platelets, echoing that PRP plays a vital role in wound healing.¹ The influence of growth factors on endothelial cells and fibroblasts will increase within seven days after injury and disappear after fourteen days. Other studies had also reported that PRP can increase and accelerate wound healing by 80% in ulcers compared to placebo.^2,3 In clinical settings, people often use PRP in the form of a solution or gel to facilitate tissue repair. The macroscopic structure of conventional PRP is inadequate because it requires implantation at a specific site, and, likely, the growth factors are not appropriately fixated during surgical procedures.

Platelet Rich Fibrin Matrix (PRFM) is the latest generation of platelet concentrates with simple preparation without biochemical ingredients (bovine thrombin). PRFM is a slow polymerization of fibrin in PRP, resulting in a PRFM structure that resembles natural fibrin.⁴ This specific structure will play an essential role in increasing cell migration, cell proliferation, and cyclic formation. Through this polymerization process, all platelets in PRP will be deposited between the PRFM fibrin fibres. According to that logic, levels of platelet (and subsequently, growth factor) in PRFM are expected to be equivalent to PRP.

Laboratory experiments looking at usage of PRFM in specific medias shows that there was an increase in levels of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) on the first day, followed by a gradual decrease on the next day.^1,5 This characteristic was not observed in PRP since most of the growth factors in PRP were released on the first day of application to the wound. PRFM also has fibrin characteristics with a more natural platelet distribution that mimics the body’s response to injury and a denser and more flexible macroscopic structure.^6,7 These factors theoretically make PRFM superior to use for wound healing.

Commercial kits for preparing PRFM had been available and widely used in clinical settings. One such example is the FIBRINET tubes which can produce PRFM from whole blood through the addition of CaCl2 and centrifugation at 1100 G for 6 minutes.⁵ However, the use of the aforementioned commercial tools has several drawbacks, including (1) High prices, rendering the use of PRFM in a clinical setting to be economically dubious; (2) concentration of platelet in PRFM is unknown, increasing the possibility of not achieving the creation of ideal PRFM. This study aims to overcome the problems mentioned above and cover the weaknesses of the existing invention by proposing a modified method to produce PRFM.

In order to guarantee the production of ideal PRFM, the modified method will ensure that Platelet Poor Plasma (PPP), a by-product in PRFM production, has a platelet content of 0/μL, representing the fact that all platelets are attached to the PRFM fibrin matrix at the bottom of the tube. Measurement of TGFβ1 will be conducted to reassure that growth factors are still available and viable inside the end product. The modified method will also try to make PRFM production more economical by creating PRFM from PRP through improvised methods without using a commercial PRFM production kit. At the same time, this study will determine the minimum amount of CaCl₂ needed to produce an ideal PRFM.

This study will carry out trials processing of human’s whole blood, making PRP and adding in 1 M of calcium chloride (CaCl₂) before centrifuging the solution to form the PRFM. The trials will evaluate whether the modified method can prepare ideal PRFM to accelerate the wound healing process. Improvement in wound healing is essential in reconstructive surgery and will affect the successes of operations both aesthetically and functionally.

2. Materials and Methods

This study was conducted in Indonesia and approved by the Ethical Clearance Committee from the Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia (202/H2.F1/ETIK/2013). The study’s design and protocol are made and implemented following the Helsinki Declaration. Volunteers recruited from the study were given an explanation, information sheet and signed the informed consent form before participating in the study.

2.3. Preparation of PRFM and calculation of thrombocyte count from PRFM-PPP

This experiment concentrates on creating PRFM using methods proposed by O’Connel, which is a modified Fibrinet (Cascade Medical Enterprise, Wayne, Ney Jersey) PRFM kit method.⁸ RegenLab PRP-Centri CH-1052 centrifuge was used (Figure 1), as it is the ideal centrifuge to produce PRFM with minimal addition of CaCl₂. The maximal speed of this centrifuge is 4,500 RPM (2,264 G). Six mL of PRP were taken from 4 different PRP specimens using a micropipette (extra care was given to avoid taking the red blood cell layer) and moved to 4 separate 10 ml cylindrical centrifuge tubes (Pyrex®, Staffordshire, England). Each tube was then added with either 70 mM, 45 mM, 25 mM, or 15 mM of CaCl₂ 1M. All four tubes were then centrifuged at 2,264 G for 25 minutes at room temperature. The resulting product will consist of two layers, the PRFM and PPP.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1.

(A) RegenLab PRP-Centri CH-1052 centrifuge used in processing the PRP in cylinder tubes and (B) Beckman CS-6R centrifuge used in processing PRP in a round plastic container.

PPP from all four PRFM specimens with different concentrations of CaCl₂ was then analyzed using the Celtac-a automatic cell counter. As previously mentioned, an ideal PRFM is the one with a 0/μL thrombocyte count in their PPP. The lowest concentration of CaCl₂ that produces an ideal PRFM was then determined as the minimum recommended concentration of CaCl₂.

After the minimum amount of CaCl₂ needed had been obtained from the previous steps, the 5^th PRP specimen was assigned to an alternative PRFM preparation method to produce a coin-shaped PRFM. Six mL from the 5th PRP specimen were taken using a micropipette and put into a round plastic container (diameter 30 mm), followed by addition of the CaCl₂. The plastic container was then centrifuged with a Beckman CS-6R centrifuge at 3,800 RPM (4,043 G) for 25 minutes (Figure 1). The resulting product will consist of two layers, the PRFM and PPP. The PRFM and PPP was taken for thrombocyte count analysis using the Celtac-a automatic cell counter.

3. Results

3.2. Determination of the minimum recommended concentration of CaCl₂ for ideal PRFM

Four PRP specimen were assigned to different amounts of CaCl₂ to determine the minimal amount in which ideal PRFM (ones with 0 μL of thrombocyte in its PPP). The schematic shown in Figure 2 shows that 25 mM of CaCl₂ 1M is the minimum amount needed to produce ideal PRFM. The fifth specimen were used to produce a coin-shaped PRFM, to represents diversity in practical application of PRFM in different clinical conditions (Figure 3). Both PRP specimen (disc and dome shaped) centrifuged with 25 mm CaCl₂ 1M had PPP of 0/μL.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2.

Finding the minimum recommended amount of CaCl₂ 1M for ideal PRFM. Regardless of the shape, 25 mM of CaCl₂ 1M is determined to be the minimum concentration needed to produce PRFM with 0/μL of thrombocyte in its PPP.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 3.

Coin shaped PRFM produced via centrifuging PRP in a round plastic container (A, B) and inverse dome PRFM produced by centrifugation in a cylinder tube (C). The variability in shape produced shows flexibility in PRFM clinical application.

3.3. PRFM analysis with SEM

Measurement of fibrin fiber and platelet diameter in PRFM specimens were performed using SEM. PRFM from 5 volunteers was prepared and fixated to produces slices that were thin enough to be analyzed by SEM. It was found that PRFM had platelets scattered among the fibrin fibers (Figure 4). The average diameter size (from three measurements in each PRFM specimens) of the subject’s platelets and fibrin fibers matrix can be seen in the table below (Table 2). PRFM from Subject 1 dried out during preparation and fixation process, rendering it unsuitable for analysis.

View this table:

• View inline
• View popup
• Download powerpoint

Table 2.

Average fibrin size and platelet diameter in PRFM analyzed through SEM.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 4.

The appearance of fibrin and platelet fibers on PRFM by SEM examination. The white arrows show the platelets between the fibrin fibers matrix. It appears that the fibrin fibers are evenly distributed like a mesh. 1000x magnification.

4. Discussion

Currently, several methods and commercial kits are available for the preparation of PRP. Most of this method will produce an end product in liquid or gel form. Due to these mechanical properties, conventional PRP is often impractical in clinical settings that require secure implantation in a specific site or where released growth factors could be washed out during an operation.

The latest development in PRP use for wound healing involves altering its physical property through plasma and platelet stimulation. Alteration of PRP physical properties can be achieved by adding calcium (CaCl₂) and centrifugation to produce PRFM without the need for additional exogenous thrombin. The addition of CaCl₂ and centrifugation to PRP will convert fibrinogen to fibrin, and the fibrin cross-links to form a matrix that contains viable platelets (Figure 3). The PRFM preparation process creates a gel-like matrix containing high concentrations of non-activated, functional, intact platelets within a fibrin matrix. These platelets had been proven to release a relatively constant concentration of growth factors over seven days.⁹

The resulting PRFM is a thin sheet with a more robust physical structure than the liquid PRP. The PRFM can replicate a natural wound healing response (i.e., the three-dimensional form of a cross-linked fibrin matrix). This scaffold-like fibrin matrix is essential as a place for platelet adhesion. This scaffolding helps localize platelets and ultimately increases the concentration of growth factors to the desired point or location for tissue regeneration.¹⁰

This experiment had successfully produced an ideal PRFM through a modified method without using any commercial reagent kit. The ideal PRFM requires that maximal platelets are trapped in the PRFM; the PPP platelet count of 0/mL can prove this. This experiment also found the minimum amount of CaCl₂ and the centrifuge settings needed to obtain the ideal PRFM. To achieve ideal PRFM, PRP obtained was mixed with 25 mM CaCl₂ 1M, then centrifuged again at a speed of 2264 G for 25 minutes at room temperature. The centrifugation will result in two layers, the PPP and PRFM. The platelet level in PPP was 0/μL; thus, it can be assumed that this method produces ideal PRFM with all the platelets from PRP adhering to the matrix fibrin. Commercial kits usually include CaCl₂ solutions in their package, though most choose not to disclose the amount or concentration of CaCl₂ used in their set.

The PRFM protocol for this study is based on a previous experiment by O’Connell, which breakdowns the creation of PRFM from whole blood. O’Connell created PRFM by inserting PRP and CaCl₂ 1M in a Wheaton bottle before starting the centrifugation. In his study, 18 mL of whole blood can create 7–8 mL of PRP, which yields a 35 mm round PRFM membrane.⁸ In our study, 8 mL of whole blood produces 6 mL of PRP, which then yields a 10 mm round PRFM membrane. A suspected vital difference in methodology lies during the PRP creation in which tubes containing a thixotropic polyester separator gel was used. These separator gels contain different properties depending on the PRP kit’s brand (O’Connell used tubes from the Cascade Autologous System, while this study used one from RegenLab). Differences in the separator gel may affect performance in isolating platelets and plasma (containing fibrinogen) from the packed red and white cell fraction.^8,11

The platelet count results for whole blood, PRP and PPP after the first centrifugation showed that the platelet count in PRP was lower than that of the whole blood (Table 1). In general, the preparation of PRP is followed by volume adjustment by removing the PPP, resulting in a platelet concentration 2.5 to 8 times higher than that found in whole blood.¹² This study’s median PRP platelet count was 97,800 (52,000-186,000)/mL – up to 50% loss of platelet, which is lower than the typical PRP platelet count.¹³ The low platelet count is probably caused by the trapping of platelets in the RegenKit gel tube or due to erythrocyte deposits (Figure 5). Unfortunately, no literature specifically discusses platelet yield in PRP production. Platelet yield must be considered in assessing the PRP creation methods used, including standardised methods (commercial kits). Ideally, efforts are made to minimise platelets lost since these platelets are a source of growth factors.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 5.

RegenKit tube with separator gel in the middle. Platelet might be trapped in the gel tube thus resulting in lower platelet count in the resulting PRP.

Based on SEM examination, it can be seen that the PRFM obtained has a microscopic fibrin fibre matrix resembling a mesh (Figure 4). All platelets derived from PRP are evenly distributed among the fibrin fibres matrix. Thus, it can be concluded that this PRFM preparation method consistently produces microscopic fibrin fibre matrix with identical platelet distribution present in ideal PRFM.¹⁰ The resulting PRFM is denser and more flexible, resembling a fascial layer that can be sewn, identical to PRFM preparation resulting from a commercial kit.⁵

Other properties analyzed in the PRFM produced are TGFβ1, a growth factor responsible for controlling and promoting cell growth, proliferation, and differentiation.¹⁴ Contrary to popular belief, usually, the TGFβ1 level in PRP is higher than the PRFM. The difference in TGFβ1 level can occur due to the activation of platelets by exogenous factors during PRP and PRFM preparation. These exogenous factors can occur during venous blood collection, pipetting, or in the centrifugation process.^15–17 Activated platelets will release granules along with their contents, including growth factors such as TGFβ1 and PDGF, which will then dissolved in the plasma. During PRFM preparation, the centrifugation process at 1,800 G for 60 minutes will precipitate platelets and the formed fibrin polymer. The dissolved protein will remain in the plasma, resulting in TGFβ1 and the activated platelets not precipitating in PRFM. It is known that both cytokines and growth factors secreted from cells have a short half-life, which means that a higher level of TGFβ1 in PRP does not mean that PRP is better than PRFM.¹⁸ Comparison of TGFβ1 between PRP and PRFM might not yield any meaningful, practical result, yet it would be interesting to look upon the correlation of the initial amount of TGFβ1 in PRFM and the amount of TGFβ1 released after the PRFM had been administered to a media or wound site.

The weakness of this study is a lack of actual observation and comparison towards actual clinical use of the PRFM produced through the modified method proposed. A follow-up study looking at how the PRFM produced through this method fare compared to PRFM produced by commercial kit would further raise the credibility of using the proposed method as alternative ways of preparing PRFM, especially in limited-resource settings. Nevertheless, the study had proven that this modified method could produce ideal PRFM with somewhat comparable quality to the ones produced using a commercial kit.

5. Conclusion

The proposed modified method by mixing PRP with 25 mM CaCl₂ 1M and centrifuging at a speed of 2264 G for 25 minutes at room temperature can reliably produce ideal PRFM comparable in quality to the commercial kit. Further follow-up study is needed to compare the performance of PRFM produced by the modified method to those produced with commercial kits.