Abstract
Background The evidence on the association between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and psychological distress in adulthood tends to rely on cross-sectional studies. In this 50-year long longitudinal study, we examined the association between both prospectively and retrospectively reported ACEs and adulthood trajectories of psychological distress between age 23 and 50. We also studied potential effect modifiers of these associations, spanning social and developmental domains of child development.
Methods The sample comprised 8,055 participants of the 1958 National Child Development Study. Psychological distress was measured by the Malaise Inventory at ages 23-50. We used growth curve analysis and multinomial regression.
Results After accounting for covariates, those with more ACEs experienced persistently higher psychological distress between age 23 and 50, with a graded relationship observed. The associations were relatively consistent across prospectively and retrospectively reported ACEs. Those with prospective or retrospective ACE score of 1 compared with 0, had on average between 0.27 and 0.39 higher distress throughout adulthood. In relative terms, the prospective ACE score of 2+ (vs 0) was associated with 3.31 and the retrospective ACE score of 4+ (vs 0) with 5.76 (95% CI 4.24 to 7.82) times higher risk of being in the “high symptoms”, compared with the “low symptoms” trajectory of distress. None of the potential effect modifiers altered the association between ACEs and trajectories of distress.
Conclusion If the associations between ACEs and trajectories of distress are causal, this emphasises the need to act early to prevent psychopathology across the adult life course.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by grant ES/P010229/1 and ES/R008930/1 from the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The NCDS was granted ethical approval for each sweep from 2000 by the National Health Service (NHS) Research Ethics Committee and all participants have given informed consent.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Cohort data comply with ESRC data sharing policies, readers can access data via the UK Data Archive (www.data-archive.ac.uk), through a formal request.