ABSTRACT
Background Non-pharmaceutical interventions to reduce the spread of COVID-19 may have disproportionately affected already disadvantaged populations.
Methods We analysed data from 2710 young adult participants of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. We assessed the associations of socioeconomic position (SEP) and Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs, e.g. abuse, neglect, measures of family dysfunction) with changes to health-related behaviours (meals, snacks, exercise, sleep, alcohol and smoking/vaping), and to financial and employment status during the first UK lockdown between March-June 2020.
Results Experiencing 4 or more ACEs was associated with reporting decreased sleep quantity during lockdown (OR 1.53, 95% CI: 1.07-2.18) and increased smoking and/or vaping (OR 1.85, 95% CI: 0.99-3.43); no other associations were seen between ACEs or SEP and health-related behaviour changes. Adverse financial and employment changes were more likely for people with low SEP and for people who had experienced multiple ACEs; e.g. people who had been in the ‘never worked or long-term unemployed’ or ‘routine and manual occupation’ categories pre-lockdown were almost 3 times more likely to have stopped working during lockdown compared with people who were in a higher managerial, administrative or professional occupation pre-lockdown (OR 2.83, 95% CI: 1.45-5.50 and OR 2.68, 95% CI: 1.63-4.42 respectively).
Conclusion Adverse financial and employment consequences of lockdown were more likely to be experienced by people who have already experienced socioeconomic deprivation or childhood adversity, thereby widening social inequalities. Despite this, in this sample of young adults, there was little evidence that lockdown worsened inequalities in health-related behaviours.
What is already known on this subject?
Non-pharmaceutical interventions implemented to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 (e.g. nationwide lockdown) have affected the lifestyles and livelihoods of many, with potential consequences for physical health and financial wellbeing.
Existing evidence suggests sociodemographic inequalities in the effects of lockdown, but details of the factors influencing these inequalities remain unclear.
What this study adds?
A history of adverse childhood experiences may be associated with decreased sleep and increased smoking/vaping during lockdown. SEP and ACEs were not associated with changes in other health-related behaviours in this cohort of young adults.
Adverse financial and employment consequences of lockdown were more likely to be experienced by people who have already experienced socioeconomic deprivation or childhood adversity, thereby widening social inequalities. Our findings highlight a need for continued support of people who experience ACEs into adulthood, and demonstrate that this need may have increased during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust through a PhD studentship to MLS [218495/Z/19/Z]. For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission. The UK Medical Research Council and Wellcome (Grant ref: 217065/Z/19/Z) and the University of Bristol provide core support for ALSPAC. This publication is the work of the authors and MLS and LDH will serve as guarantors for the contents of this paper. A comprehensive list of grants funding is available on the ALSPAC website (http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/external/documents/grant-acknowledgements.pdf). This research was specifically funded by Wellcome Trust and MRC UoB Faculty Research Director's Discretionary Fund (Grant ref: 102215/2/13/2).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was obtained from the ALSPAC Law and Ethics Committee and the Local Research Ethics Committees.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
ALSPAC data are available by application to the study executive committee, subject to submission and approval of a project proposal and payment of data access fees. For details and inquiries, please see http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/access/ or email alspac-data{at}bristol.ac.uk. Full details of all ALSPAC data are available in the ALSPAC data dictionary, which can be found at http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/external/documents/ALSPAC_Data_Dictionary.zip.
http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/access/
http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/external/documents/ALSPAC_Data_Dictionary.zip
