Abstract
Introduction SARS-CoV-2 infections have very different clinical manifestations and anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunisation may also trigger very different levels and length of protection. While (re)infection after previous COVID-19 illness or following vaccination are known, their impact and the optimal timing of any booster vaccination is currently debated. International evidence about potential underlying immune response differences remains limited and is currently not available in Hungary.
Methods We prospectively investigated the magnitude of immune responses to infection or immunisation, their over-time changes and the occurrence of new infections through anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels and the association with selected individual and clinical parameters in two voluntary cohorts of healthcare workers at a public teaching hospital in a real-world longitudinal cohort study in Hungary. In the first cohort, the anti-nucleocapsid IgG levels of 42 health care workers (female: 100%) with SARS-CoV-2 infection were followed-up over 8 months between June 2020 and February 2021. Beyond the change in immune response, associations with age, selected existing chronic conditions, blood type and severity of symptoms were investigated. In the immunised cohort, anti-spike-RBD protein IgG levels of 49 health care workers (female: 73%) with no prior COVID-19 infection were monitored up to 4 months following initial immunisation with BNT162b2 vaccine between December 2020 and April 2021. Statistical analyses included median analysis, linear regression, ANCOVA, Kruskal-Wallis test and Skillings-Mack test for block designs as relevant.
Results Within the infected cohort, the median time of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG level reduction below the positive test cut-off was 6 months. First month IgG levels were on average the highest among those in illness severity category 4, but the difference to less severe categories was not statistically significant. Higher age was associated with higher IgG levels. Within the immunised cohort, the anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike-RBD protein IgG levels increased 25-fold between the first and second immunisations, significantly decreased to 33% of the peak level after 90 days, and had an overall negative tendency with older age and male sex. IgG monitoring revealed 17% (7/42) and 14% (7/49) new infections in the infected and the immunised cohorts, respectively, all symptomless.
Discussion Our study is the first to investigate the level, change and associations of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG immune response in infected or immunised healthcare workers in Hungary. It provides further evidence about the significantly declining IgG protection through initial infection beyond 6 months. While immunisation with mRNA vaccination shows a similar pattern of reduction in protection, IgG levels remained within the positive range at 4 months. The observed rate of 15% new, asymptomatic infections and their potential broader impacts call for further investigations. Overall, our findings are confirmative of the effectiveness of vaccination to prevent illness, recent considerations for booster vaccination beyond 6 months, and indicate the potential benefit of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG monitoring for optimisation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors received no specific funding for the work. The costs for the laboratory tests used in the study have been covered by the Foundation for Liver and Pancreatic Patients, Hungary.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Local Institutional Committee of Science and Research Ethics, Szent Gyorgy University Teaching Hospital, Szekesfehervar, Hungary (Nr. 16/20200723)
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Study data are available upon request from the corresponding author.
