ABSTRACT
In May 2021, over 160 million SARS-CoV-2 infections have been reported worldwide. Yet, the true amount of infections is unknown and believed to exceed the reported numbers by several fold, depending on national testing policies that can strongly affect the proportion of undetected cases. To overcome this testing bias and better assess SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics, we propose a genome-based computational pipeline, GInPipe, to reconstruct the SARS-CoV-2 incidence dynamics through time. After validating GInPipe against in silico generated outbreak data, as well as more complex phylodynamic analyses, we use the pipeline to reconstruct incidence histories in Denmark, Scotland, Switzerland, and Victoria (Australia) solely from viral sequence data.
The proposed method robustly reconstructs the different pandemic waves in the investigated countries and regions, does not require phylodynamic reconstruction, and can be directly applied to publicly deposited SARS-CoV-2 sequencing data sets. We observe differences in the relative magnitude of reconstructed versus reported incidences during times with sparse availability of diagnostic tests. Using the reconstructed incidence dynamics, we assess how testing policies may have affected the probability to diagnose and report infected individuals. We find that under-reporting was highest in mid 2020 in all analysed countries, coinciding with liberal testing policies at times of low test capacities.
Due to the increased use of real-time sequencing, it is envisaged that GInPipe can complement established surveillance tools to monitor the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and evaluate testing policies. The method executes within minutes on very large data sets and is freely available as a fully automated pipeline from https://github.com/KleistLab/GInPipe.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
M.R.S., M.T., Y.D. and MvK acknowledge funding from the Germany ministry for science and education (BMBF; grant numbers 01KI2016 and 031L0176A). D.K. and A.W. acknowledge funding from the Max Planck Society. A.W. acknowledges financial support through a scholarship (Landesgraduiertenstipendium), funded by the State of Thuringia, Germany. The funders had no role in designing the research or the decision to publish.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N/A
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Paper in collection COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 preprints from medRxiv and bioRxiv
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
1
Blogs/Media
Author Videos