Abstract
Early detection of dental caries has been one of the most predominant topics studied over the last few decades. Conventional examination through visual-tactile inspection and radiography can be inaccurate and destructive to the tooth structure. The development of optical coherence tomography (OCT) has given dentistry an alternative diagnostic technique, which has been proven by numerous studies, that it has better sensitivity, specificity, and non-invasive characteristics. The growing popularity of artificial intelligence (AI) also contributes to a more efficient and effective way of image-based detection and decision-making. However, previous studies, which have attempted to employ AI for caries assessment, did not incorporate high-quality ground truth data. Therefore, this study aims to bypass this issue and highlights the importance of high-quality data. A two-phase study was carried out to explore different methods for caries detection. Initially, the comparison of caries detection based on OCT and apical radiography by 5 experienced clinicians was conducted. Then, five convolutional neural networks (CNNs), including AlexNet, VGG-16, ResNet-152, Xception, and ResNext-101, in the scope of AI were employed to detect caries and compared with the findings of the 5 clinicians. The data was preprocessed and labeled with the ground truth corresponding to microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) with rigorous definition. The weighted Kappa statistics suggested that OCT (ϰ= .699, SD = .090) showed a higher accuracy rate than radiography (ϰ= .407, SD = .049), and CNNs (ϰ= .860, SD = .049) were rated higher than clinicians (ϰ= .679, SD = .113), both at a .05 significance level. The best result was carried out by ResNet-152, which demonstrated a high accuracy rate of 95.21% and a sensitivity of 98.85%. These findings illustrate the importance of ground truth data for AI training and the potential of deep CNN algorithms combined with OCT for diagnosing dental caries.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research was partially supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 108-2813-C-010-040-B) and the Department of Health, Taipei City Government (10901-62-017).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of National Yang-Ming University (YM109025E).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* asd3926782{at}gm.ym.edu.tw
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author (Lee, SY). The data are not publicly available because they contain information that could compromise research participant privacy/consent.
