Abstract
Background The global burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is forecast to increase, and anticoagulants will remain important medicines for its management. Coroners’ Prevention of Future Death reports (PFDs) provide valuable insights that may enable safer and more effective use of these agents.
Aim To identify CVD-related PFDs involving anticoagulants.
Design and Setting Retrospective observational study of coronial case reports in England and Wales between 2013 and 2019.
Method We screened 3037 PFDs for eligibility and included PFDs where CVD and an anticoagulant caused or contributed to the death. We descriptively analysed included cases and used content analysis to assess concerns raised by coroners and who responded to them.
Results We identified 113 cardiovascular disease-related PFDs involving anticoagulants. Warfarin (36%), enoxaparin (11%), and rivaroxaban (11%) were the most common anticoagulants reported. Concerns most frequently raised by coroners included poor systems (31%), poor communication (25%), and failures to keep accurate medical records (25%). These concerns were most often directed to NHS trusts (29%), hospitals (10%), and general practices (8%). Nearly two-thirds (60%) of PFDs had not received responses from such organisations, which are mandatory under regulation 28 of the Coroners’ (Investigations) Regulations 2013. We created a publicly available tool, https://preventabledeathstracker.net/, which displays coroners’ reports in England and Wales to streamline access and identify important lessons to prevent future deaths.
Conclusion National organisations, healthcare professionals, and prescribers should take actions to address the concerns of coroners’ in PFDs to improve the safe use of anticoagulants in patients with cardiovascular disease.
How this fits in A previous assessment of 500 PFDs identified anticoagulants as the class of drugs most often involved in fatal medication errors. This study uses innovative methods to automatically collect all available PFDs between 2013 and 2019 to identify deaths from cardiovascular disease when the use of or lack of anticoagulants caused or contributed to the death. Coroners’ raised hundreds of coroners in their reports, including issues with communication, following protocols, education and training, access to resources, and safety. Despite repeat concerns with national relevance being identified, most CVD-anticoagulant PFDs were sent locally to NHS Trusts, hospitals, and general practices, limiting their ability to reduce harms and prevent premature deaths.
Competing Interest Statement
AA has no competing interest to disclose. CH is a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Senior Investigator and has received expenses and fees for his media work, received expenses from the World Health Organisation (WHO), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and holds grant funding from the NIHR School for Primary Care Research (SPCR), and the NIHR SPCR Evidence Synthesis Working Group [Project 380], the NIHR BRC Oxford and the WHO. On occasion, CH receives expenses for teaching EBM and is also paid for his GP work in NHS out of hours (contract with Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust). CH is the Director of the CEBM. JKA has published articles and edited textbooks on adverse drug reactions and interactions and has often given medicolegal advice, including appearances as an expert witness in coroners' courts, dealing with the adverse effects of drugs. NJD has no conflicts related to the submitted work. Outside the submitted work, he declares a doctoral studentship from the Naji Foundation, grant funding from the Fetzer Franklin Memorial Fund, and employment on grants from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, The Good Thinking Society, and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). GCR was financially supported by the NIHR SPCR, the Naji Foundation, and the Rotary Foundation to study for a Doctor of Philosophy (2017-2020) but no longer has any financial COIs. GCR is an Associate Editor of BMJ Evidence Based Medicine. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Clinical Trial
https://osf.io/rvw43
Clinical Protocols
Funding Statement
No funding was obtained to undertake this study.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
As the case reports are publicly available on the Judiciary website, approval from an ethics committee was not required.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos