Abstract
Estimates from conventional Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses can be biased when the genetic variants proposed as instruments vary over age in their relationship with the exposure. For four exposures commonly studied using MR, we assessed the degree to which their relationship with genetic variants commonly used as instruments varies by age using flexible, spline-based models in UK Biobank data. Using these models, we then estimated how biased MR estimates would be due to age-varying relationships using plasmode simulations. We found that most genetic variants had age-varying relationships with the exposure for which they are a proposed instrument. Body mass index and LDL cholesterol had the most variation while alcohol consumption had very little. This variation over age led to small potential biases in some cases (e.g. alcohol consumption and C-reactive protein) and large potential biases for many proposed instruments for BMI and LDL.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
S.A.S. was supported by Veni grant 91617066 from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) and the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMW).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The UK Biobank has ethics approval from the UK National Health Service's National Research Ethics Service (ref 11/NW/0382).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data are available from the UK Biobank to individuals who apply for and receive permission from the appropriate UK Biobank study committees.
