ABSTRACT
Biliary duct hamartomas are benign lesions of intrahepatic bile ducts. Oftentimes an incidental finding on imaging, these lesions can pose a diagnostic dilemma because of their overlapping features with malignant masses. We performed a structured systematic review of literature and identified 139 cases of biliary duct hamartomas. Patient demographics, clinical presentation with key laboratory and imaging findings, diagnostic modalities, management strategies, and outcomes were analyzed and systematically summarized. The systematic review is aimed to help with better understanding of biliary duct hamartomas and its principal features.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=230745
Funding Statement
There was no funding received.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and presented fully anonymised non-identifiable information that did not require prior approval by the Institutional Review Board.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: The authors have no conflict of interest and sources of funding to declare.
Data Availability
Data will be made available on special request by the corresponding author.
