Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted people’s routine in several ways, including the temporary cessation of face-to-face teaching activities, which may affect the mental health of the population. This study aimed to assess the mental health of the academic community of a University in South Brazil during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Methods Cross-sectional web-based survey conducted between July-August 2020 through a self-administered online questionnaire. All University staff and students were eligible. Depression was assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and anxiety by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7. All analyses were stratified by academic or administrative staff, undergraduate and graduate students.
Results 2,785 individuals participated in the study. Prevalence of depression and anxiety were 39.2% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 37.3-41.1) and 52.5% (95% CI 50.6-54.4), respectively. On stratified analyses, undergraduate students showed a higher prevalence of the outcomes compared to other groups. In relation to social distancing, higher prevalence of mental illness was associated to strictly following the authority’s guidelines and with not leaving the house routinely, but these associations were restricted to some subgroups. Mental health care and previous diagnosis of mental illness were associated with higher rates of anxiety and depression.
Limitations The main concerns were the representativeness of the sample and the response rate.
Conclusions An alarming prevalence of mental illness was observed in this academic community. Despite the well-known benefits of social distancing and quarantine to public health, it requires a special surveillance on the mental health of the population, especially students and those with previous mental illness diagnosis.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
This is a cross-sectional study that was outlined in a pandemic phase. We did not have the opportunity to publish a protocol prior to the development of the research. However, this study was submitted to an human ethics committee for research.
Funding Statement
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Prior to data collection, a pre-test of the questionnaire was carried out assessing the understanding of the instruments used and time to complete the questionnaire. For this, four researchers were consulted. This cross-sectional study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Pelotas under Protocol number 4.103.085. All subjects were invited to participate and those who accepted, signed an informed consent form electronically.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Declarations of interest: none.
Funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author Statement Contributors Helena Silveira Schuch – Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing - Original Draft
Mariana Gonzalez Cademartori – Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing - Original Draft
Valesca Doro Dias – Investigation, Writing - Review & Editing
Mateus Luz Levandowski – Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - Review & Editing
Tiago Munhoz – Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing - Review & Editing
Pedro Curi Hallal –Writing - Review & Editing
Flávio Fernando Demarco – Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - Review & Editing, Supervision, Project administration
All authors have approved the final version of the article.
Data Availability
The database for this study is not available on an external database. However, they can be made available if requested.
