Abstract
There is an intimate body-brain connection in ageing, and obesity is a key risk factor for poor cardiometabolic health and neurodegenerative conditions. Although research has demonstrated deleterious effects of obesity on brain structure and function, the majority of studies have used conventional measures such as waist-to-hip ratio, waist circumference, and body mass index. While sensitive to gross features of body composition, such global anthropomorphic features fail to describe regional differences in body fat distribution and composition, and to determine visceral adiposity, which is related to a range of metabolic conditions. In this mixed cross-sectional and longitudinal design (interval mean and standard deviation = 19.7 ± 0.5 months), including 790 healthy individuals (mean (range) age = 46.7 (18-94) years, 53% women), we investigated cross-sectional body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, n = 286) measures of adipose tissue distribution in relation to longitudinal brain structure using MRI-based morphometry and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). We estimated tissue-specific brain age at two time points and performed Bayesian multilevel modelling to investigate the associations between adipose measures at follow-up and brain age gap (BAG) at baseline and follow-up. We also tested for interactions between BAG and both time and age on each adipose measure. The results showed credible associations between T1-based BAG and liver fat, muscle fat infiltration (MFI), and weight-to-muscle ratio (WMR), indicating older-appearing brains in people with higher measures of adipose tissue. Longitudinal evidence supported interaction effects between time and MFI and WMR on T1-based BAG, indicating accelerated ageing over the course of the study period in people with higher measures of adipose tissue. The results show that specific measures of fat distribution are associated with brain ageing and that different compartments of adipose tissue may be differentially linked with increased brain ageing, with potential to identify key processes involved in age-related transdiagnostic disease processes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study is supported by the Research Council of Norway (223273, 249795, 248238, 276082), the South Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority (2014097, 2015044, 2015073, 2016083, 2018037, 2018076), the Norwegian ExtraFoundation for Health and Rehabilitation (2015/FO5146), KG Jebsen Stiftelsen, Swiss National Science Foundation (grant PZ00P3193658), German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, grant 01ZX1904A), ERA Net Cofund through the ERA PerMed project IMPLEMENT (Research Council of Norway 298646), and the European Research Council under the European Unions Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation program (ERC StG, Grant # 802998 and RIA Grant # 847776).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was conducted in line with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Regional Ethics Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (REC); South East division in Norway. The Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (REC) has reviewed and approved the Research Project. StrokeMRI study reference number: 2014/694, TOP study reference number: 2009/2485.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data and code used in the study will be freely available in a public repository (Open Science Framework) and eventually directly accessible through the OSF webpage.