ABSTRACT
Objectives To explore the impact of COVID-19 on companionship for women using maternity services in England, as part of the Achieving Safe and Personalised maternity care In Response to Epidemics (ASPIRE COVID-19 UK) study.
Setting Maternity care provision in England.
Participants Interviews were held with 26 national governmental, professional, and service-user organisation leads including representatives from the Royal College of Midwives, NHS England, Birthrights and AIMS (July-Dec). Other data included public-facing outputs logged from 25 maternity Trusts (Sept/Oct) and data extracted from 78 documents from 8 key governmental, professional and service-user organisations that informed national maternity care guidance and policy (Feb-Dec).
Results Six themes emerged: ‘Postcode lottery of care’ highlights variations in companionship practices, ‘Confusion and stress around ‘rules’’ relates to a lack of and variable information concerning companionship, ‘Unintended consequences’ concerns the negative impacts of restricted companionship on service-users and staff, ‘Need for flexibility’ highlights concerns about applying companionship policies irrespective of need, ‘‘Acceptable’ time for support’ highlights variations in when and if companionship was ‘allowed’ antenatally and intrapartum; and ‘Loss of human rights for gain in infection control’ emphasizes how a predominant focus on infection control was at a cost to psychological safety and women’s human rights.
Conclusions Policies concerning companionship have been inconsistently applied within English maternity services during the COVID-19 pandemic. In some cases, policies were not justified by the level of risk, and were applied indiscriminately regardless of need. This was associated with psychological harms for some women and staff. There is an urgent need to determine how to balance risks and benefits sensitively and flexibly and to optimise outcomes during the current and future crisis situations.
Strengths and limitations of this study
This is the first paper to consider links between policy and practice in companionship in maternity care during the COVID-19 pandemic;
Data triangulation across stakeholders, policy and practice provides nuanced and context related perspectives on why and how companionship was impacted;
Stakeholders included representatives from all key agencies involved in maternity care;
Practice related issues were collected from the maternity Trust website and social media-based public facing information, which may or may not reflect actual care practices;
The study does not include information directly reported by parents and healthcare professionals.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), as part of UK Research and Innovations rapid response to COVID-19 [grant number ES/V004581/1]. Full details of the main study are available via ResearchRegistry (researchregistry5911) and via UKRI Gateway (https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=ES%2FV004581%2F1)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics approval for the study was given from the Health ethics sub-committee from the University of Central Lancashire (project no: 0079 - 24th June 2020).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Trust level data is included in the paper. Details of all documents analysed is provided/with all information freely available. All relevant interview data concerning companionship will be openly available from UCLanData and a doi provided on paper acceptance.