Abstract
Background and objectives The odds of nephrolithiasis increase with more metabolic syndrome (met-s) traits. We evaluated associations of metabolic and dietary factors from urine studies and stone composition with met-s traits in a large cohort of stone-forming patients.
Design, setting, participants & measurements Patients >18 years, who were evaluated for stones with 24 h urine collections, July 2009-December 2018, had records reviewed retrospectively. Patient factors, laboratory values and diagnoses were identified within 6 months of urine collection and stone composition within 1 year. Four groups with 0, 1, 2, ≥ 3 met-s traits (hypertension, obesity, dyslipidemia, diabetes) were evaluated. Trends across groups were tested using linear contrasts in analysis of variance and analysis of covariance.
Results 1473 patients met inclusion criteria (835 with stone composition). Met-s groups were 0=684, 1=425, 2=211, 3 and 4 =153. There were no differences among groups for urine volume, calcium or ammonium (NH4) excretion. There was a significant trend (p<0.001) for more met-s traits being associated with decreasing urine pH, increasing age, calculated dietary protein, urine uric acid, oxalate, citrate, titratable acid (TAP), net acid excretion (eNAE) and uric acid supersaturation. The ratio of ammonium to net acid excretion did not differ among the groups.
After adjustment for protein intake, the fall in urine pH remained strong, while the upward trend in TAP excretion was attenuated and NH4 decreased. Calcium oxalate stones were most common, but there was a trend for more uric acid (p<0.001) and fewer calcium phosphate (p=0.09) and calcium oxalate stones (p=0.01) with more met-s traits.
Conclusions Stone forming patients with met-s have a defined pattern of metabolic and dietary risk factors that contribute to an increased risk of stone formation including higher acid excretion, largely the result of higher protein intake, and lower urine pH.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
no external funding was received
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
University of Vermont IRB deemed exempt from research but does oversight to ensure Stone Registry meets compliance. Study does not involve randomization and change from standard practice. No risk and personal identifiers removed.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data from manuscript is kept on a secure password protected folder in the secure hospital computer system
