Abstract
Background Assessing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by children in schools is of critical importance in informing public health action. Quantification of transmission by active contact tracing in children and their contacts can be practically challenging even in non-pandemic times.
Methods Cases of COVID-19 in children in London schools were identified through statutory notification and matched to schools reporting cases. Bubble and non-bubble ‘control’ contacts at school and household contacts for each case were longitudinally sampled and tested for SARS-CoV2 using PCR. Surfaces and air in the home and school environment were also subject to longitudinal sampling and testing for SARS-CoV-2 for 21 days or 28 days.
Results Secondary transmission was not detected in 28 individual Bubble contacts, representing 10 distinct bubbles. Across the 8 non-bubble ‘school contact’ classes, 3/62 pupils tested positive – all three were asymptomatic and tested positive in one setting on the same day, unrelated to the original index case. In contrast the secondary attack rate in naïve household contacts of children was 14.5% and the inferred secondary attack rate was 25%. Environmental contamination with SARS-CoV-2 was rare in all schools studied, regardless of school type. This contrasted with contamination in households, where 20-30% of samples were positive.
Summary The low levels of environmental contamination in schools are consistent with low transmission frequency and adequate levels of cleaning and ventilation in schools during the period of study. Secondary transmission in schools appeared to be infrequent during the study period. The frequency of secondary transmission in households associated with evident viral shedding throughout the home points to a need to improve advice to households with diagnosed infection in children.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
ISRCTN 13773960
Funding Statement
UKRI/Department of Health & Social Care, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The protocol was approved by the London (Chelsea) Research Ethics Committee (REC), HRA London Centre, Skipton House, London SE1 6LH (Schools Transmission Study REC reference 18/LO/0025; IRAS Reference 225006). Informed consent was obtained from all participants or parents/guardians, and assent was obtained from any participant aged under 18.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
This version represents a full update of SARS CoV2 transmission data and environmental data in schools and households from the TraCK study, extending the period studied to July 2021 (previously December 19th 2020). Updated data Tables and Figures are provided alongside updated supplementary materials. Three additional co-authors are included.
Data Availability
Any data not included in the manuscript are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request
