ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND As part of the response to increase critical care capacity during the unprecedented surge of COVID-19 infections, NYC Health + Hospital systems identified and resourced areas in the hospital that could deliver critical care as “Flex” ICUs to complement the traditional ICUs to manage the rapid influx of critically ill patients.
OBJECTIVE Comparison of clinical features and outcomes of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients admitted to the traditional and “Flex” ICUs during the surge of the pandemic
METHODS Retrospective comparative cohort study of patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection on mechanical ventilation admitted to traditional ICU and ‘Flex’ ICU. Univariate and multivariate analysis to detect factors associated with death from COVID-19 patients in mechanical ventilation were performed with the Cox proportional hazards regression model
RESULTS Out of the 312 patients on mechanical ventilation, 111 were admitted to the traditional ICU and 201 to the ‘Flex’ ICU. The mortality rate was higher in the ‘Flex’ ICU compared with the traditional ICU, but the adjusted risk model was not significantly associated with increased mortality
CONCLUSION “Flex” ICUs played a crucial role in the management of critically ill patients during the pandemic. Mortality risk of patients in the “Flex” ICUs were comparable to traditional ICUs in the adjusted analysis. While there is enough evidence for Intensivist managed ICUs to have better outcomes, our study demonstrates the feasibility of non-intensivist led Flex” ICUs during a crisis.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors received no specific funding for this work
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was a retrospective observation study that received an Institutional Review Board approval (IRB # 20-007, Lincoln Medical Center)
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data available as request