Reanalysis of the Pfizer mRNA BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine data fails to find any increased efficacy following the boost: Implications for vaccination policy and our understanding of the mode of action
View ORCID ProfileAllan Saul, View ORCID ProfileHeidi E. Drummer, View ORCID ProfileNick Scott, Tim Spelman, Brendan S. Crabb, View ORCID ProfileMargaret Hellard
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.23.21252315
Allan Saul
1The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia
Heidi E. Drummer
1The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia
6Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Clayton, 3168
7Department of Microbiology at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052
Nick Scott
1The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia
2Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Tim Spelman
1The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia
Brendan S. Crabb
1The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia
3Department of Immunology and Pathology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
4Doherty Institute and School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
Margaret Hellard
1The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia
2Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
4Doherty Institute and School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
5Department of Infectious Diseases, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
Article usage
Posted March 01, 2021.
Reanalysis of the Pfizer mRNA BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine data fails to find any increased efficacy following the boost: Implications for vaccination policy and our understanding of the mode of action
Allan Saul, Heidi E. Drummer, Nick Scott, Tim Spelman, Brendan S. Crabb, Margaret Hellard
medRxiv 2021.02.23.21252315; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.23.21252315
Reanalysis of the Pfizer mRNA BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine data fails to find any increased efficacy following the boost: Implications for vaccination policy and our understanding of the mode of action
Allan Saul, Heidi E. Drummer, Nick Scott, Tim Spelman, Brendan S. Crabb, Margaret Hellard
medRxiv 2021.02.23.21252315; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.23.21252315
Subject Area
Subject Areas
- Addiction Medicine (386)
- Allergy and Immunology (701)
- Anesthesia (193)
- Cardiovascular Medicine (2859)
- Dermatology (244)
- Emergency Medicine (431)
- Epidemiology (12569)
- Forensic Medicine (10)
- Gastroenterology (807)
- Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4447)
- Geriatric Medicine (402)
- Health Economics (716)
- Health Informatics (2856)
- Health Policy (1050)
- Hematology (376)
- HIV/AIDS (893)
- Medical Education (415)
- Medical Ethics (114)
- Nephrology (464)
- Neurology (4201)
- Nursing (223)
- Nutrition (617)
- Oncology (2205)
- Ophthalmology (626)
- Orthopedics (254)
- Otolaryngology (319)
- Pain Medicine (269)
- Palliative Medicine (83)
- Pathology (488)
- Pediatrics (1172)
- Primary Care Research (483)
- Public and Global Health (6787)
- Radiology and Imaging (1494)
- Respiratory Medicine (902)
- Rheumatology (430)
- Sports Medicine (369)
- Surgery (473)
- Toxicology (57)
- Transplantation (202)
- Urology (174)