Abstract
Introduction The association between sociodemographic factors, such as poverty, lack of maternal schooling, and being male at birth, and childhood developmental delay and poor educational outcomes has been established in the Dominican Republic. However, moderating factors present or introduced in families to buffer the effects of such factors on childhood development are still unknown.
Methods We conducted a secondary analysis of the 2014 Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey for the Dominican Republic, a national household survey focused on maternal and child health and development. The first aim of our study was to determine if a sociodemographic model predicted early childhood development. The second aim was to determine if a psychosocial model (including family childrearing practices, discipline, and early childhood stimulation) predicted early childhood development above and beyond the sociodemographic model.
Results We found that both models predicted childhood development significantly, but that the psychosocial model explained 5% more variance than the sociodemographic model. The most relevant sociodemographic predictors were socioeconomic position and mother’s education, which uniquely explained 21% and 17% of the early childhood development variance, respectively. The most salient psychosocial predictors of early childhood development were: 1) attendance to an early childhood education program, which uniquely explained 15.0% of the variance; 2) negative discipline, which uniquely explained 12.4% (negative impact); 3) the number of children’s books at home, which uniquely explained 12.0%; and 4) stimulating activities at home, which uniquely explained 5%.
Conclusion These results have multiple implications for social programs that aim to improve children’s developmental potential in contexts of poverty. Although the results show a protective effect of psychosocial factors, sustainable and large-scale intervention should not be limited to just buffering effects, but to actually solve the underlying problem which is that poverty prevents children from reaching their developmental potential.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study was funded by the 2018 Carol Lavin Bernick Faculty Grant Program at Tulane University made to Arachu Castro, who was also funded through gifts from the Zemurray Foundation for her position as the Samuel Z. Stone Chair of Public Health in Latin America at the Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine (New Orleans, Louisiana, United States).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
After registration at http://mics.unicef.org/ by entering a username and password and requesting access to conduct secondary data analysis of childhood development indicators, the UNICEF MICS team approved access to the MICS datasets on February 19, 2018. The MICS survey responds to local regulations and protocols regarding data collection and fieldwork (CITE). The Dominican Republic does not demand to obtain approval from an Ethical review board. However, the MICS protocol requires all data to be kept strictly confidential, including secure storage of records and databases with no identifiers. In addition, the protocol requires the interviewer to obtain appropriate informed consent from survey respondents. More information available in the MICS Manual, pages 25-26, at: https://mics.unicef.org/files?job=W1siZiIsIjIwMTUvMDMvMzEvMDgvNTUvMjYvOTg3L01JQ1M0X01hbnVhbF9QcmVwYXJpbmdfZm9yX0RhdGFfQ29sbGVjdGlvbl9hbmRfQ29uZHVjdGluZ19GaWVsZHdvcmsuZG9jeCJdXQ&;sha=8d74d95f24a423eb.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
This study used de-identified secondary data that are publicly available.
