Abstract
Background While cognitive decline has been frequently reported in aging research, moderating factors for cognitive changes in healthy aging have been inconclusive. This study evaluated 5-year changes in four cognitive abilities and the potential moderation of age and cognitive reserve (CR) factors on cognitive changes.
Methods Participants included 254 healthy adults initially aged 20 – 80 years. Six tasks estimated each of the four abilities: fluid reasoning, processing speed, memory and vocabulary. The proxies for CR included years of education and IQ. Cognitive changes and moderating factors were examine using multiple indicator latent change score model. Change point analysis pinpointed inflection points after which cognitive changes accelerated.
Results There was significant decline over five years in fluid reasoning, processing speed and memory, with age moderation such that older age was associated with steeper decline. Accelerated decline was observed earlier for reasoning and speed, at ages 58 and 59 years respectively, than for memory, at age 70 years. Vocabulary continued to improve until reaching peak performance at 67 years. For moderation of cognitive changes by CR proxies, while education did not show significant moderation, higher IQ was associated with reduced 5-year decline in reasoning and memory but not processing speed. CR moderation effect was found to be independent of mean cortical thickness.
Conclusions Using a robust statistical model to estimate the latent change in four cognitive abilities over 5 years, the results showed that cognitive reserve rather than brain maintenance is the potential mechanism underlying IQ’s protective effect on cognitive decline.
Highlights
Reasoning and processing speed show accelerated decline after ages 59 and 58 years, respectively.
Memory shows accelerated decline after age 70 years.
Vocabulary performance peaks at age 67 years.
Higher IQ is protective of cognitive decline in reasoning and memory but not for processing speed.
IQ’s protective effect on cognition is independent of brain maintenance.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Institute of Aging (grant numbers K01AG051777, R01AG026158, R01AG038465, and R01AG062578-01A1).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the Columbia University Institutional Review Board. Participants were only tested after they had a complete understanding of the risks and benefits involved in this research and had provided written consent for participation and use of their data.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data examined in the manuscript are available upon request in deidentified format.