Abstract
In late March 2020, SARS-CoV-2 arrived in Manaus, Brazil, and rapidly developed into a large-scale epidemic that collapsed the local health system, and resulted in extreme death rates. Several key studies reported that ∼76% of residents of Manaus were infected (attack rate AR≃76%) by October 2020, suggesting protective herd immunity had been reached. Despite this, in November an unexpected second wave of COVID-19 struck again, and proved to be larger than the first creating a catastrophe for the unprepared population. It has been suggested that this could only be possible if the second wave was driven by reinfections. Here we use novel methods to model the epidemic from mortality data, evaluate the impact of interventions, in order to provide an alternative explanation as to why the second wave appeared. The method fits a “flexible” reproductive number R0(t) that changes over the epidemic, and found AR≃30-34% by October 2020, for the first wave, which is far less than required for herd immunity, yet in-line with recent seroprevalence estimates. The two-strain model provides an accurate fit to observed epidemic datasets, and finds AR≃70% by March 2021. Using genomic data, the model estimates transmissibility of the new P.1 virus lineage, as 1.9 times as transmissible as the non-P1. The model thus provides a reasonable explanation for the two-wave dynamics in Manaus, without the need to rely on reinfections which until now have only been found in small numbers in recent surveillance efforts.
Significance This paper explores the concept of herd immunity and approaches for assessing attack rate during the explosive outbreak of COVID-19 in the city of Manaus, Brazil. The event has been repeatedly used to exemplify the epidemiological dynamics of the disease and the phenomenon of herd immunity, as claimed to be achieved by the end of the first wave in October 2020. A novel modelling approach reconstructs these events, specifically in the presence of interventions. The analysis finds herd immunity was far from being attained, and thus a second wave was readily possible, as tragically occurred in reality. Based on genomic data, the multi-strain model gives insights on the new highly transmissible variant of concern P.1 and role of reinfection.
Competing Interest Statement
DH supported by Hong Kong Research Grants Council Collaborative Research Fund (C7123-20G). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Funding Statement
DH was partly funded by an Alibaba (China) Co. Ltd. Collaborative Research grant.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N.A.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
We updated with some new information on the current understanding and two co-authors.
Data Availability
All data used in this work are publicly available.
