Abstract
Laboratory blood testing is routinely used to assay biomarkers to provide information on physiologic state beyond what clinicians can evaluate from interpreting medical imaging. We hypothesized that deep learning interpretation of echocardiogram videos can provide additional value in understanding disease states and can predict common biomarkers results. Using 70,066 echocardiograms and associated biomarker results from 39,460 patients, we developed EchoNet-Labs, a video-based deep learning algorithm to predict anemia, elevated B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), troponin I, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and abnormal levels in ten additional lab tests. On held-out test data across different healthcare systems, EchoNet-Labs achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80 in predicting anemia, 0.82 in predicting elevated BNP, 0.75 in predicting elevated troponin I, and 0.69 in predicting elevated BUN. We further demonstrate the utility of the model in predicting abnormalities in 10 additional lab tests. We investigate the features necessary for EchoNet-Labs to make successful predictions and identify potential prediction mechanisms for each biomarker using well-known and novel explainability techniques. These results show that deep learning applied to diagnostic imaging can provide additional clinical value and identify phenotypic information beyond current imaging interpretation methods.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
BH is supported by NSF - DGE-114747. DO is supported by American College of Cardiology / Merck Fellowship. JZ is supported by NSF - CCF 1763191, NIH R21 MD012867-01, NIH P30AG059307, and grants from the Silicon Valley Foundation and the Chan-Zuckerberg Initiative.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Stanford IRB and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center IRB
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵^ Co-senior author
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos