ABSTRACT
Plasmodium vivax relapses caused by reactivating hypnozoites are a major barrier for elimination and control of this form of malaria. Radical cure is a form of therapy capable of addressing this problem. Recent clinical trials of radical cure have yielded efficacy estimates ranging from 65% to 94%, with substantial variation across trial sites. We performed an analysis of simulated trial data using a transmission model to demonstrate that variation in efficacy estimates across trial sites can arise from differences in the conditions under which trials are conducted. Our analysis revealed that differences in transmission intensity, heterogeneous exposure, and relapse rate can yield efficacy estimates ranging as wide as 11-82%, despite simulating trial data under the uniform assumption that treatment had a 75% chance of clearing hypnozoites. We show that vector control and parasite genotyping offer two potential means to yield more standardized efficacy estimates that better reflect protection against relapse.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
JHH acknowledges funding from a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship and a Richard and Peggy Notebaert Premier Fellowship from the University of Notre Dame. CK received funding from NIH R21-AI137891. NN and MTW were supported by a grant from Medicine for Malaria Venture. NN also received funding from a Pasteur Roux-Cantarini Fellowship. This publication was made possible with partial support from Grant Numbers TL1 TR002531 and UL1TR002529 (A. Shekhar, PI) from the National Institutes of Health, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Clinical and Translational Sciences Award.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB approval was not required for this work, because no human data was used.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.