Abstract
Background According to IDF Diabetes Atlas 2019, globally, 463 million people live with Diabetes mellitus. Out of that, 88 million people are in South East Asia. By 2045, it is expected to increase by 51% globally and 74% in South East Asia. Global variation in susceptibility to diabetes, insulin sensitivity, and regimen intensity due to race and ethnic differences pose a challenge regarding the optimal choice of second-line therapy for clinicians. Asian populations are at higher risk of developing diabetes mellitus than the European population. The current study was carried out to see the relative efficacy of currently available long-acting insulins in reducing blood sugar, HbA1c and the occurrence of hypoglycemia as a complication associated with them.
Methods A systematic literature search was done using various search engines (PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Embase) and included published RCTs in English before December 2019. Further, a manual search was performed by screening the reference list of the identified articles.
Results We included four RCTs with 534 participants (349 in the insulin degludec group and 185 in the insulin glargine group) with T2DM. Results show that both insulin glargine and degludec are equally efficacious in reducing fasting blood glucose and HbA1c. However, insulin glargine was associated with lower risks of hypoglycemia.
Conclusions Insulin glargine and degludec are comparable in achieving glycemic control with fewer hypoglycemic episodes in insulin glargine treated group.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
None
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval has been obtained.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data included in meta-analysis have been presented in the manuscript.
