ABSTRACT
Background SARS-CoV-2 surrogate neutralization assays that obviate the need for viral culture offer substantial advantages regarding throughput and cost. The cPass SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Antibody Detection Kit (Genscript) is the first such commercially available assay, detecting antibodies that block RBD/ACE-2 interaction. We aimed to evaluate cPass to inform its use and assess its added value compared to anti-RBD ELISA assays.
Methods Serum reference panels comprising 205 specimens were used to compare cPass to plaque-reduction neutralization test (PRNT) and a pseudotyped lentiviral neutralization (PLV) assay for detection of neutralizing antibodies. We assessed the correlation of cPass with an ELISA detecting anti-RBD IgG, IgM, and IgA antibodies at a single timepoint and across intervals from onset of symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Results Compared to PRNT-50, cPass sensitivity ranged from 77% - 100% and specificity was 95% - 100%. Sensitivity was also high compared to the pseudotyped lentiviral neutralization assay (93% [95%CI 85-97]), but specificity was lower (58% [95%CI 48-67]). Highest agreement between cPass and ELISA was for anti-RBD IgG (r=0.823). Against the pseudotyped lentiviral neutralization assay, anti-RBD IgG sensitivity (99% [95%CI 94-100]) was very similar to that of cPass, but overall specificity was lower (37% [95%CI 28-47]). Against PRNT-50, results of cPass and anti-RBD IgG were nearly identical.
Conclusions The added value of cPass compared to an IgG anti-RBD ELISA was modest.
Competing Interest Statement
J. Papenburg reports grants from MedImmune, grants from Sanofi Pasteur, grants and personal fees from Seegene, grants and personal fees from Janssen Pharmaceutical, grants and personal fees from AbbVie, outside the submitted work. MPC reports personal fees from GEn1E Lifesciences (as a member of the scientific advisory board) and personal fees from nplex biosciences (as a member of the scientific advisory board), both outside the submitted work.
Funding Statement
C.P.Y and J. Papenburg hold a "Chercheur-boursier clinicien" career award from the Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé (FRQS). This work was partially supported by le Ministère de l’économie et de l'Innovation du Québec (Program de soutien aux organismes de recherche et d'innovation), by the Fondation du CHUM, and by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (via the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force) to A.F. A.F. is the recipient of a Canada Research Chair on Retroviral Entry (RCHS0235 950-232424). G.B.B, and J. Prévost are supported by CIHR fellowships. R.G. is supported by a MITACS Accélération postdoctoral fellowship. cPass kits were provided in kind by Genscript. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All work was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki in terms of informed consent and approval by an appropriate institutional board. Convalescent plasmas were obtained from donors who consented to participate in this research project at Héma-Québec, the agency responsible for blood supply in Quebec, Canada, (Research Ethics Board [REB] # 2020-004) and the Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM) (REB # 19.381). The donors met all donor eligibility criteria: previous confirmed COVID-19 infection and complete resolution of symptoms for at least 14 days. At the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre (RI-MUHC), where cPass testing was performed, an REB exemption was granted on the basis that this work was considered to be a laboratory quality improvement project with no risk to participants.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding C.P.Y and J. Papenburg hold a “Chercheur-boursier clinicien” career award from the Fonds de recherche du Québec – Santé (FRQS). This work was partially supported by le Ministère de l’Économie et de l’Innovation du Québec (Program de soutien aux organismes de recherche et d’innovation), by the Fondation du CHUM, and by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (via the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force) to A.F. A.F. is the recipient of a Canada Research Chair on Retroviral Entry (RCHS0235 950-232424). G.B.B, and J. Prévost are supported by CIHR fellowships. R.G. is supported by a MITACS Accélération postdoctoral fellowship. cPass kits were provided in kind by Genscript.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Potential conflicts of interest J. Papenburg reports grants from MedImmune, grants from Sanofi Pasteur, grants and personal fees from Seegene, grants and personal fees from Janssen Pharmaceutical, grants and personal fees from AbbVie, outside the submitted work. MPC reports personal fees from GEn1E Lifesciences (as a member of the scientific advisory board) and personal fees from nplex biosciences (as a member of the scientific advisory board), both outside the submitted work.
Data Availability
After peer-reviewed publication, data available on request in the setting of a suitable research protocol.