Abstract
Background Malnutrition is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in children aged under five years, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Although severe acute malnutrition (SAM) is considered the most serious form of malnutrition, moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) affects greater numbers globally and, unlike SAM, guidelines lack a robust evidence-base. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the evidence for lipid-based nutrient supplements (LNS), fortified-blended-flours (FBF) and nutrition counselling, in the treatment of MAM.
Methods Five databases were systematically searched for studies conducted in LMICs that compared the effectiveness of food-based products versus any comparator group in promoting recovery from MAM in children aged 6-59 months. Where appropriate, pooled estimates of effect were estimated using random-effects meta-analyses.
Results A total of thirteen trials were identified for inclusion. All used active controls rather than ‘standard care’, which is often minimal in most settings. There was evidence of increased probability of recovery (as assessed by gaining normal weight-for-height and/or MUAC) among children treated with LNS compared to children treated with FBF (RR 1·05, 95%CI 1·01-1·09, p=0·009). Treatment with an LNS was also associated with a lower risk of persistent MAM at the end of treatment compared with a FBF (RR 0·82, 95%CI 0·71-0·95, p=0·007).
Conclusion Based on a relatively small number of studies mainly from Africa, LNS are superior to FBF in improving anthropometric recovery from MAM. The true benefit of MAM treatment may be underestimated due to all studies using active controls rather than usual care which is minimal.
More high-quality evidence is needed to evaluate nutrition education/counselling alone as a MAM intervention. Studies should also assess a wider range of outcomes including body composition, morbidity and development – not weight-gain alone.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=68513&RecordID=68513
Funding Statement
There was no funding source.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Abbreviations
- AM
- Acute Malnutrition
- CCC
- Child Centred Counselling
- CCT
- Controlled-Clinical Trials
- CI
- Confidence Interval
- ComPAS
- Combined Protocol for Acute Malnutrition Study
- CSB
- Corn-Soy Blend
- FBF
- Fortified Blended Flours
- FFM
- Fat-Free Mass
- FFMI
- Fat-Free Mass Index
- HAZ
- Height-for-Age z-score
- HFIAS
- Household Food Insecurity Access Scale
- HIV
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus
- LMIC
- Low- and Middle-Income Country
- LNS
- Lipid-based Nutrient Supplement
- MAM
- Moderate Acute Malnutrition
- MSBP
- Malted-Sorghum Based Porridge
- MUAC
- Middle Upper Arm Circumference
- NCHS
- National Centre for Health Statistics
- PICO
- Point, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome
- PRISMA
- Preferred Reporting-Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
- RCT
- Randomised-Controlled Trial
- RR
- Relative Risk
- RUF
- Ready-to-Use Food
- RUSF
- Ready-to-Use Supplementary Food
- RUTF
- Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Food
- SAM
- Severe Acute Malnutrition
- SFP
- Supplementary Feeding Programme
- TB
- Tuberculosis
- UN
- United Nations
- UNICEF
- United Nations Children’s Fund
- WFP
- World Food Programme
- WHO
- World Health Organisation
- WLZ
- Weight-for-length z-score
- WHZ
- Weight-for-Height z-score
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos