Abstract
Background Patients with bipolar disorder have a high lifetime risk of suicide. Predicting, preventing and managing suicidal behavior are major goals in clinical practice. Changes in suicidal thoughts and behavior are common in the course of treatment of bipolar disorder.
Methods Using a dataset from a randomized clinical trial of bipolar disorder treatment (N=98), we tested predictors of future suicidal behavior identified through a review of literature and applied marginal variable selection and machine learning methods. The performance of the models was assessed using the optimism-adjusted C statistic.
Results Number of prior hospitalizations, number of prior suicide attempts, current employment status and Hamilton Depression Scale were identified as predictors and a simple logistic regression model was constructed. This model was compared with a model incorporating interactions with treatment group assignment, and more complex variable selection methods (LASSO and Survival Trees). The best performing models had average optimism-adjusted C-statistics of 0.67 (main effects only) and 0.69 (Survival Trees). Incorporating medication group did not improve prediction performance of the models.
Conclusions These results suggest that models with a few predictors may yield a clinically meaningful way to stratify risk of emerging suicide events in patients who are undergoing pharmacologic treatment for bipolar disorder.
Significance Statement This study aims to find out whether suicide events that occur during the pharmacological treatment of bipolar disorder, a severe psychiatric disorder that is highly associated with suicide behavior, can be predicted. Using existing methods, we developed and compared several predictive models. We showed that these models performed similarly to predictive models of other outcomes, such as treatment efficacy, in unipolar and bipolar depression. This suggests that suicide events during bipolar disorder may be a feasible target for individualized interventions in the future.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Institute of Health (grant number 5K23DA042136).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This is a statement regarding the above manuscript. 1. Full names / affiliations of all ethics committees / Institutional Review Boards that ruled on ethics of your study. This study is reviewed by the New York State Psychiatric Institute Institutional Review Board. 2. Decision made, i.e. whether ethical approval was given or waived. Ethical approval was waived.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.