Abstract
Introduction Special Study Module is a mandatory research project implemented in some medical curriculum. For the successful application of evidence-based practice, physicians must understand research methodology before the appraisal of relevant evidence. The objective of this paper is to provide a brief overview of the effectiveness of student research modules in enhancing research understanding.
Methods Second-year students of undergraduate medical programs were included in this study. At the beginning and after completion of literature review type research projects, the same student cohort completed a questionnaire comprising sections on perceived competency, attitude, and knowledge on research skills. Data from 163 participants who completed both pre and post-survey were analyzed.
Results Paired t-test revealed significant differences in self-perceived knowledge, attitude, and assessed knowledge of the subjects before and after completing the research modules. Multivariate analysis also displayed a significant increase in self-perceived and assessed knowledge by carrying out the project. No significant association was exhibited by gender and ethnicity.
Conclusions In summary, the research module improved students’ understanding of research methodology as well as the structure of scientific communication. Further studies to assess the effect of various types of research modules in different study populations are warranted.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
no external funding was received
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
AIMST University, Malaysia. Approval number: AUHEAC/FOM/2016/08)
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos